Analysis
In 1986, a farm known as Cefn Coed was purchased by Mr and Mrs Williams and one of their sons, the appellant. There was no express declaration of trust. Mr and Mrs Williams and the appellant were in a partnership and the partnership paid the mortgage on Cefn Coed. The wills of Mr and Mrs Williams dealt with Cefn Coed as though it was held on a tenancy in common in equal shares and Mr Williams was found to have served a notice of severance of any joint tenancy before his death. Mrs Williams and then Mr Williams passed away. It was determined that Cefn Coed was not a partnership asset but, in support of a claim in proprietary estoppel, the appellant sought to establish that Cefn Coed, on purchase, was held on a joint tenancy in equity. At first instance, the judge held that Cefn Coed was held as tenants in common.
Held (dismissing the appeal):
- (1) It is for the person asserting that the legal owner of property is not also the beneficial owner to make out their case that the beneficial ownership is different.
- (2) Equity will usually assume that co-owners acquiring property for business purposes do not intend survivorship or, therefore, a joint tenancy.
- (3) In this matter, the purchase of Cefn Coed was a commercial decision made by partners for the benefit of the partnership business. That was sufficient for the court to assume that survivorship, and therefore a joint tenancy, was not intended and that Cefn Coed, on purchase, was held on a tenancy in common. The mortgage being treated as a partnership liability or being joint borrowing did not change this result and neither did any statements about inheritance.
Continue reading "Williams v Williams & ors [2024] WTLR 1137"