Vimercati v BV Trustco Ltd & ors [2012] EWHC 1410 (Ch)

January/February 2013 #126

The claimant, Ambra (A), who had been a beneficiary under the MBV Trust, disputed the price obtained by BV Securities for its 20% shareholding in Air Italy in view of certain subsequent transactions involving Meridiana and Air Italy Holdings, a company in which the third defendant and protector of the trust (G) had an interest through his investment holding company. A also threatened breach of trust proceedings against the trustees. G and the fourth and fifth defendants, his wife and son, remained beneficiaries under the trust but A’s interest had been severed under a deed of appoi...

Re BXL Services [2012] EWHC 1877 (Ch)

December 2012 #125

BXL Services (the company) was a charitable company limited by guarantee. Owing to government cuts and a large pension deficit, it became insolvent and the directors resolved to place it into administration pursuant to para 22 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (the Act). No formal notice in the form prescribed by para 26(2) to Schedule B1 of the Act was given to the company itself. On one construction of the Act, this omission was fatal to the validity of the appointment. On a second construction, it was not an omission at all as such notice was not a requirement. On a third cons...

Re D 576 of 2005

December 2012 #125

Mrs D had lost her mental capacity and a committee of guardians was appointed by the court to look after her financial affairs including her interest as primary beneficiary of a Cayman Islands family trust. Before she lost capacity Mrs D entered into a settlement agreement (the peace accord) with her family, settling many years of litigation in the Cayman Islands. Two of the committee of guardians (the other members of the committee were conflicted by reason of their own interest in the settlement agreement) applied to the Grand Court under the Mental Health Law (1997 Revision) seeking d...

DL v A Local Authority & ors [2012] EWCA Civ 253

December 2012 #125

Mr and Mrs L were an elderly married couple who, at the relevant time, were living with DL, their middle aged son, in the family home. Neither were at that time incapable, by reason of any impairment of, or disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain, of managing their own affairs within the meaning of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). However, the local authority, which was concerned about alleged threatening and controlling behaviour on the part of DL, sought and obtained injunctive relief to protect Mr and Mrs L. Evidence obtained by the official solicitor concluded that bo...

Fine v Fine [2012] EWHC 1811 (Ch)

December 2012 #125

The settlors, who were husband and wife, each executed a trust deed in mirror terms in 1992, creating discretionary trusts. At the time the trust deeds were executed the settlors had only one grandchild, Maxwell. The trust deeds contained inter alia the following definition of the beneficiaries:

‘The settlor’s children, Tracey Mathew and Kitty and his [her] grandchild Maxwell, and remoter issue and the spouses, widows and widowers of such children, grandchildren and remoter issue.’

On the same date as the trust deeds were executed the settlors...

Gudavadze & ors v Kay & ors [2012] EWHC 1683 (Ch)

December 2012 #125

The deceased (Badri) was a wealthy Georgian businessman. Since Badri’s death litigation, in relation to both the devolution and administration of his estate, had been conducted in numerous jurisdictions. Mr Boris Berezovsky maintained claims against the estate on the basis of alleged joint ventures, but for the purpose of this action supported various members of Badri’s family (the family defendants) in their challenge of documents alleged to have testamentary force.

Badri’s half-cousin and sometime business assistant, Mr Joseph Kay (Mr Kay), had, since Badri...

Hanson v HMRCC [2012] UKFTT 314 (TC)

December 2012 #125

In 2006, the appellant received loan notes as part of the consideration for a sale of a business. He disposed of these loan notes in 2008. The disposal gave rise to a chargeable gain for Capital Gains Tax (CGT) purposes of £1,261,387. Following the disposal the appellant read an article which suggested that UK holiday letting properties could be used to mitigate CGT charges. The appellant had already purchased such a property. He consulted with his usual accountants, Clarke Broom Flemming (CBF) who indicated to the appellant that a form of holdover relief would be available to mitigate t...

Re Harcourt MHLO 74 (LPA)

December 2012 #125

On 15 June 2009, Mrs Harcourt executed a lasting power of attorney (LPA) for property and affairs in which she appointed her daughter (A) to be her sole attorney. The LPA was registered with the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) on 13 August 2009. In July 2011 the manager of Mrs Harcourt’s care home contacted the local county council expressing concerns that A had not paid Mrs Harcourt’s care home fees and that she gave her very little pocket money. The manager also expressed concerns regarding loans and credit cards which had recently been taken out in Mrs Harcourt’s...

Khaira & ors v Shergill & ors [2012] EWCA Civ 983

December 2012 #125

In October 1987, the Birmingham Gurdwara (a Sikh place of worship) was purchased by four individuals and then by a deed dated 15 January 1991 the original trustees declared trusts of this property. They were trustees of the religious organisation following the teaching of His Holiness the First Holy Saint resident at Nirmal Kutia in the Punjab India ‘or his successor’. Clause 5 of the trust deed allowed the First Holy Saint ‘or his successor’ to remove trustees and appoint new trustees.

Sant Baba Jeet Singh Ji Maharaj (the ninth claimant) purported to retir...

Spurling & anr v Broadhurst & ors [2012] EWHC 2883 (Ch)

December 2012 #125

Ronald Anthony Allcroft Gibbons (the testator), who had no family, made a handwritten will on 29 December 2010 by which he appointed the claimants as his executors and gave them his residuary estate ‘to hold on trust to pay my debts, taxes and testamentary expenses and pay the residue to Veronica Broadhurst, Ann Foden, the living grandchildren of Veronica Broadhurst, and David Spurling in equal shares’. The testator died the following year and the claimants, who considered the terms of the residuary gift to be ambiguous, sought a declaration as to its construction. The third ...