Dorey & ors v Ashton [2024] WTLR 121
Spring 2024 #194The plaintiffs were three of the four children of the deceased, who died in 2015. They contended that the deceased lacked capacity when making wills in 2004. Instructions for the wills had been taken by the defendant, who had prepared them and supervised their execution. Had the wills not been made, the deceased’s estate would have passed to the plaintiffs and their sibling, subject to a life interest in realty for the deceased’s widow; the effect of the wills was to confer on the widow additional benefits. Following the death of the deceased, the plaintiffs and their sibling challenged ...
Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd & anr v Ruhan & ors [2024] WTLR 145
Spring 2024 #194This was an appeal against a decision of Foxton J ordering the second defendant to pay £102m in compensation for dishonest assistance along with nearly £60m in interest.
The first defendant had been a director of the first claimant. In breach of fiduciary duty, the first defendant had caused the first claimant to sell company assets related to several London hotels to a corporate purchaser in which the first defendant had an undisclosed interest. The sale was at an objectively reasonable market price. The purchaser later sold the hotels for a large profit (partly due to having dev...
King v King [2024] WTLR 177
Spring 2024 #194Eric Stanley King (deceased), a divorcee, died intestate on 15 April 2021. Rule 22 of the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 (NCPR 1987) set out the order of priority for a grant of letters of administration on an intestacy; in this case, the persons entitled were the appellant and respondent (being the children of the deceased) and the three children of a third child who had predeceased the deceased. Where more than one person of the same degree was entitled to a grant, the court had a discretion as to which of them it should appoint as administrator. In this case the entitlement to a g...
Leeson & anr v McPherson [2024] WTLR 197
Spring 2024 #194On 6 June 2017, Ms Leeson died in Denmark. Her husband, the defendant, was prosecuted and ultimately acquitted of her murder. After such acquittal, civil proceedings were issued alleging inter alia that the defendant unlawfully killed Ms Leeson and the inquest proceedings resumed. In the civil proceedings, the parties were ordered to and did produce a schedule of agreed facts. Such schedule was based on the disclosure in the civil proceedings, including third-party disclosure from the police. The claimants’ solicitors acting in the inquest proceedings asked for permission that such sched...
Nandakopan v Nandakopan [2024] WTLR 217
Spring 2024 #194The deceased died intestate in 2020 with an estate worth around £120,000. He had married the claimant in January 1993, and they had a daughter, the defendant, in November 1993. They had an unhappy marriage and little family life, although they all continued to live together. In 2014, the deceased transferred the matrimonial home from his sole name to the joint names of him and the defendant as beneficial joint tenants, such that on his death his share of the property passed to the defendant. The property was worth around £450,000. In 2017, the claimant brought proceedings against the dec...
National Westminster Bank plc & ors v Ludlow Trust Co Ltd & ors [2024] WTLR 239
Spring 2024 #194Each of the claimant banks were part of the NatWest Group and appointed as trustee of a number of trusts. Following the decision by the NatWest Group in 2019 to divest itself of its trusteeships and trust administration business, a bidding process was commenced seeking a replacement trustee for 3,946 trusts, both private and charitable, and the first defendant (Ludlow) was ultimately the successful bidder based upon a detailed scoring system. The trust administration business was transferred to Ludlow for £1 and Ludlow agreed to pay all of the claimants’ costs of transferring the various...
Richefond & ors v Dillon & ors [2024] WTLR 253
Spring 2024 #194The first claimant and her co-executors sought to propound a will which was resisted by the first to third defendants. In a previous judgment the Master had determined that the will was valid as to part but the gift of residue to the first claimant failed because the testator did not know and approve of that part in light of his illiteracy and the lack of proper explanation from the will draftsman. The result was that the testator’s home was held on trust for the first claimant’s occupation but the residuary estate passed on the statutory trusts of intestacy between the five defendants.<...
Shah v Commissioners for HMRC [2024] WTLR 265
Spring 2024 #194The executor of the estate of the deceased appealed against a notice of determination under s221 Inheritance Tax Act 1984 that the deceased was domiciled in England and Wales at the time of his death.
The deceased was born in Karachi in what was then British India in 1929. He attended school and university in Karachi in the 1940s. Following partition, in 1947 he moved from Karachi, Pakistan to Gujarat, India to complete his university course. On completion, he moved to Tanzania. In 1954 he moved to the UK to undertake a further degree, returning to Tanzania on completion in 1957. ...
Thandi v Saggu [2024] WTLR 283
Spring 2024 #194The claimant was the freehold registered proprietor of 7 Parkside Parade, Dartford, Kent (7 Parkside Parade). The defendant was managing director of a construction company called Earlswood Interiors Ltd (Earlswood Interiors). Earlswood Interiors carried out some work on the claimant’s home, a different property. There was an issue with payment for additional works. In April 2018 Earlswood Interiors had been owed £15,000 and had demanded that sum from the claimant. It was found that no unwarranted or illegitimate pressure had been applied to the claimant but she had felt under pressure to...
Winter & anr v Winter & anr [2024] WTLR 327
Spring 2024 #194The court was concerned with the claim of Richard and Adrian Winter to challenge the dispositions made by their father, Albert Winter, in his will dated 30 April 2015 (the 2015 will) which left the residue of his estate to their brother, Philip. The principal asset in Albert’s estate was his share in a market garden business operated by the family for many years, and since 1998 as a partnership between Albert, his late wife Brenda, the claimants and the first defendant. In January 2004 the partnership business was transferred to a company.
The claim was put on two principal bases....