Continue reading "Trusts: A fair result?"
Trilogy Management Ltd v Harcus Sinclair [2016] EWHC 170 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2017 #168This was an application by the defendant firm of solicitors (D) for the particulars of claim and reply to be struck out on the ground that they disclose no answer to the limitation defence or summary judgment dismissing the entirety of the claim on the basis that the claimant (C) has no real prospect of success because the claim is statute barred.
The proceedings arose out of a family dispute concerning a charitable trust (F) established by the deceased (OM). By his will OM left his shares in a Jersey investment company (JY) and in the trustee company of F (YT) to the executors an...
Trusts: A long-term solution
Continue reading "Trusts: A long-term solution"
Trusts: 30 years’ flaw
Continue reading "Trusts: 30 years’ flaw"
Trusts: Do your homework
Continue reading "Trusts: Do your homework"
Trusts: A safe foundation
Continue reading "Trusts: A safe foundation"
Re The Hanover Trust [2013] SC (Bda) 38 Civ
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2016 #165A trustee (T) of Bermudian trusts applied to the Bermudian court by an originating summons for directions. The originating summons named the settlor and principal beneficiaries as defendants. The application invoked the Bermudian court’s supervisory jurisdiction over Bermudian trusts.
The issue arose as to whether T needed leave to serve the originating summons on four overseas resident defendants.
Held:
- 1) Leave for service of an originating summons out of the jurisdiction is not required for non-contentious applications by Bermudian trustees for directions ...
Pemberton v Pemberton & ors [2016] EWHC 2345 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2016 #165This case involved a claim by one of the trustees of the Pemberton Settled Estates, originally created on 31 March 1965, for a variation of the settlement. The first to third defendants were the other trustees of the settlement who had in mind the unborn and unascertained beneficiaries. There were also four adult defendants and four defendants who were minor beneficiaries. All defendants supported the variation.
The claimant proposed the following variation:
- a) to set the perpetuity period running afresh for a further 125 years;
- b) to confer on the trustees a...
Trusts: When is a ‘trust’ not a trust?
Continue reading "Trusts: When is a ‘trust’ not a trust?"
Trusts: Finding a way
Continue reading "Trusts: Finding a way"