Trusts: Shedding light on remuneration trusts

Mary Ashley reports on a rare taxpayer win Cases like Marlborough are helpful to reveal how HMRC will form its arguments when it wants a tribunal to look at the overall effect of an arrangement rather than the detail. Marlborough DP Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2021] is a First-tier …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: The court’s power to bless decisions

Melody Munro reviews a case that exposes the delicate balance trustees have to maintain between beneficiaries’ wishes and what is best for the trust It is, quite rightly, not for the court to impose its own view of the merits of a decision but rather to consider whether the trustee’s decision is one which a …
This post is only available to members.

Trusts: Making well-documented inquiries

Robert Lindley and Wesley O’Brien provide a step-by-step guide to dealing with missing or uncooperative beneficiaries It will be important for the trustee to be capable of demonstrating that it has made sufficient reasonable efforts to find and/or contact the relevant person. Trusts exist for the benefit of their beneficiaries and it is to beneficiaries …
This post is only available to members.

SM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] WTLR 1025

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Autumn 2021 #184

On 3 August 2016, the appellant made a claim for income-related Employment and Support Allowance, asking for any award to be backdated to 2 June 2016. The appellant was in receipt of regular monthly payments from discretionary family trusts of £600 per month, rising to £750 per month from July 2016. She also received £750 per month from a lodger from July 2016.

Her application was refused on 10 July 2018 on the basis that her income exceeded the limit under the Employment and Support Allowance Regulations 2008. A mandatory reconsideration confirmed the initial outcome, an...

Trusts: Perception vs reality

Caroline Doyle reviews STEP’s recent report on trusts and its findings STEP reports that is clear that the perception in the UK is that trusts are the purview of the rich and famous. It is suggested that this is in part due to many people being introduced to the concept of trusts through literature focusing …
This post is only available to members.

Rittson-Thomas & ors v Oxfordshire County Council [2021] WTLR 679

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2021 #183

The appeal concerned Nettlebed School in Oxfordshire. In 1914 and 1928, Mr Robert Fleming conveyed land to Oxfordshire County Council (the council) under the School Sites Act 1841 (SSA 1841). The benefactions enabled a new school building to be built. The school operated on the site until 2006. In the 1990s, the council decided to relocate the school to a new building with improved facilities on other land owned by the council (adjacent to the old site), and the pupils moved to the new building in February 2006. The council’s plan was to sell the old site to pay o...

Womble Bond Dickinson (Trust Corporation) Ltd & ors v Glenn & ors [2021] WTLR 737

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Summer 2021 #183

The trustees of a settlement sought directions as to whether they could advance capital to certain beneficiaries pursuant to their powers under s32 Trustee Act 1925, as varied by a clause of the trust deed, so as to bring the trust to an end. They sought a declaration as to whether the proposed advancements were within the power as a matter of construction, (ie whether there were beneficiaries with interests prior to those of the beneficiaries in whose favour the advancements were to be made, whose consent was required), and, presuming that they were within that power, the court...

Re C Trust [2021] WTLR 69

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Spring 2021 #182

This was an application by P (a current trustee) to be appointed as sole trustee of the trust under s31(1) Trustee Act 1975 (Bermuda), and for liberty to manage the assets of the trust on the basis that it had been validly appointed as trustee by a deed dated 1 July 2015.

The trust was established by a deed dated 22 June 1965 between the settlor and the original trustee. It was a discretionary trust, with the beneficiaries including the settlor and his brothers then living or born at any time thereafter, subject to certain limitations in favour of the male line of descend...

Manton & ors v Manton [2021] WTLR 245

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Spring 2021 #182

The claimants were four of the five trustees of a trust. The defendant was the other trustee. The trust property included the share capital of a holding company (‘the holding company’) which in turn had a wholly owned subsidiary (‘the subsidiary’). A third company (‘the trading company’), the shares of which were also held by the holding company, occupied and traded from premises owned by the subsidiary, to which it paid rent. This, together, with distributions of profits, generated the majority of the income flowing to the trustees. In 2016, a revocable appointment of a life interest ha...

Trusts: Lost in translation

Ross Pizzuti-Davidson looks at interpreting foreign law concepts in English law trusts The court’s judgment in PTNZ in relation to the protector’s role may be a welcome clarification given the surprising lack of authority on the point of whether a protector’s consent rights are joint or review powers. International estate planners can find themselves playing …
This post is only available to members.