Trustees: Setting the scope of relief

Mathew Newman and Abby Lund review Guernsey‘s first written judgment on the rule in Hastings-Bass ‘The court ultimately held that any breach of duty by a trustee was capable of being treated as enabling the court to intervene and exercise the Hastings-Bass jurisdiction to set aside the relevant act or transaction, if the court was …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: Who pays?

John Greenfield and Elaine Gray outline recent Channel Island decisions on the personal liability of trustees ‘Under the Art 32(1)(a) regime, the trustee remains liable in law on the obligation and is the person against whom an action must be brought by the creditor.’ This article reviews a series of judgments delivered in 2014 and …
This post is only available to members.

Trustees: When to indemnify

Natasha Dzameh clarifies the circumstances in which Beddoe orders and protective cost orders can be used ‘The master explained that the risk of injustice could be removed by ensuring the costs risk of the third party claim fell onto the two capital beneficiaries for whose benefit the litigation continued.’The role of a trustee can be …
This post is only available to members.

TM v AH [2016] EWHC 572 (Fam)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | September 2016 #162

The wife applied to join the trustees of the A trust and the B trust as parties to the litigation between the husband and wife. The husband was the settlor of both trusts. At one point husband and wife had been beneficiaries. They have now been irrevocably excluded from benefit. The wife was applying to vary both trusts.

One trust was subject to BVI jurisdiction and the other to the jurisdiction of the Swiss courts. The trustees of each trust were not submitting to the jurisdiction, and were intending to apply to the foreign courts for directions as to what to in respect of the l...

Trustees: Lost founder’s rights

Rosamond McDowall looks at Labrouche v Frey [2016], which serves as a reminder of the different types of breaches of trust and their remedies ‘The court found that under Swiss law, the agreement between Hugo and Olga could exclude the rights of the heirs of her estate, and that the ability to enforce it survived …
This post is only available to members.

Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing [2015] EWHC 2366 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | March 2016 #157

Taylor Wessing LLP (TW) are the London solicitors of Grampian Trust Company Limited (the trustee), a company resident and incorporated in the Bahamas. The trustee is trustee of a discretionary settlement known as the Glenfinnan settlement, settled in 1992 and governed by Bahamian law. The Glenfinnan settlement was a resettlement of certain funds from an earlier Bahamian settlement (the 1973 settlement). The first claimant is a beneficiary of the Glenfinnan settlement. The second and third claimants, her children, are not beneficiaries. In 2006 and 2009 the trustee made substantial appoin...

James & anr v Louisewilliams & ors [2015] EWHC 1166 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2015 #155

Thomas Edward Weetman (the deceased) died on 3 November 2008. His last will was executed on 19 September 2008 (the will). The principal assets in his estate (the estate) were shares in his company Weetman (Haulage & Storage) Ltd (the company) which he had successfully built up during his lifetime, and shares in a property known as Pasturefields Enterprise Park (the property) which the deceased owned but which was occupied, in whole or in part, by the company. The estate was of considerable value but illiquid. The will provided that fifty percent of the deceased’s shares in the ...

Re the Onorati Settlement [2013] JRC 182

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2015 #155

This was an application by two beneficiaries of the Onorati Settlement, a Jersey discretionary trust (the trust), to set aside a deed of appointment distributing the trust fund to them. The application was made under the so-called principle in Hastings-Bass on the basis that the trustee had failed to take into account considerations which they ought to have taken into account when exercising their discretion, namely the UK tax consequences of making the appointment. Their application was on the basis that the Respondent (the trustee) had failed to take adequate tax advice.

<...

Shenken v Phoenix [2015] CSOH 96

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2015 #155

This case concerned whether a Florida attorney who had not obtained a grant in the UK had capacity to receive the proceeds of certain life insurance policies. The proceeds of two life assurance policies were held in trusts established by Mr Pinder and his then wife (Mr Pinder’s trust and Mrs Pinder’s trust respectively). Both trusters are now deceased and the sums assured under the policies became payable on the second death on 17 November 2010. On Mr Pinder’s death he was the sole remaining trustee of his trust and on his death the trust became a lapsed trust. On 2 March 2011 letters of...