Set aside: Right outcome, wrong route?

Ellie Foster analyses the court’s recent application of the Barder principles to a pension sharing order and whether the correct procedural route was adopted In Goodyear, it was necessary to understand the rationale for the pension share agreed, particularly given the flexible nature of pensions and the fact that in many cases they are treated …
This post is only available to members.

Van der Merwe v Goldman & anr [2016] EWHC 790 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | June 2016 #160

The claimant and first defendant were husband and wife and joint freehold owners of a property in the UK where they lived. Up until March 2006 the claimant and first defendant were treated as domiciled in South Africa. However, from 6 April 2006 they would be treated as domiciled in the UK for inheritance tax purposes. In November 2005 the claimant took advice on mitigating the consequences of being treated as domiciled in the UK for the purposes of inheritance tax. He was advised that his position would be improved if he placed the property into an interest in possession settlement.

...