Schrader v Schrader [2013] EWHC 466 (Ch)

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | May 2013 #129

Jessica Schrader (the testatrix) died a widow aged 98. The testatrix’s two sons, the claimant (Nick) and the defendant (Bill), survived her.

By a will dated 1 October 1990 (the 1990 will), drafted by a firm of solicitors, the testatrix had made specific gifts of shares and savings bonds to her grandchildren and thereafter left her residue (on her husband having predeceased) to Nick and Bill in equal shares absolutely.

However, in or about May 2005, the testatrix suffered a fall and Nick moved into the testatrix’s property to act as her carer. On 12 April 2006, a further wil...

Capacity: Masterman-Lister and Bailey v Warren revisited

Deirdre Goodwin considers when neurological advice should be sought Where a person sought to rely on an unsoundness of mind, he had to show that such incapacity had been known to his opponent. The recent case of Dunhill v Burgin highlights the risks of settling cases where the claimant lacks capacity and a litigation friend …
This post is only available to members.

Crafer v Jesshope

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | June 2012 #120

The application concerned a rift within the Jesshope/Crafer family. Mrs Edith Jesshope, aged 89, was the respondent. Mr Hubert Jesshope, aged 90, had been married to Mrs Jesshope for 65 years. Mrs Jesshope was the mother of Graham and Susan. The applicant was Susan’s husband, Mr Ian Crafer.

In mid-2008, Mr Jesshope took steps to require Graham to move out of the long time family house in Esher owned by Mr and Mrs Jesshope. Mrs Jesshope asserted a wish to live with Graham instead of Mr Jesshope. A rift emerged between Mrs Jesshope and Graham on one side (liviing in the Esher ...