Williams v Williams & ors [2024] WTLR 1137

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Autumn 2024 #196

In 1986, a farm known as Cefn Coed was purchased by Mr and Mrs Williams and one of their sons, the appellant. There was no express declaration of trust. Mr and Mrs Williams and the appellant were in a partnership and the partnership paid the mortgage on Cefn Coed. The wills of Mr and Mrs Williams dealt with Cefn Coed as though it was held on a tenancy in common in equal shares and Mr Williams was found to have served a notice of severance of any joint tenancy before his death. Mrs Williams and then Mr Williams passed away. It was determined that Cefn Coed was not a partnership asset but,...

Raveendran v Commissioners for HMRC WTLR(w) 2024-05

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Web Only

Provincial Equity Finance Ltd v Dines WTLR(w) 2023-04

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Web Only

Sangha v Sangha & ors WTLR(w) 2021-12

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Web Only

Beneficial ownership: Opening the door

Establishing a common intention constructive trust when property ownership is in one occupant’s name and not the other can be tricky. Melody Munro gives an update Once a common intention is established, the court is adopting a fairly expansive view as to how a claimant may act to their detriment. Although claimants, defendants and common …
This post is only available to members.

Ralph v Ralph WTLR(w) 2021-04

Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Web Only

A house was purchased in the joint names of the defendant and his son, the claimant. At least part of the reason for the claimant’s inclusion was that it allowed the defendant to benefit from a mortgage needed to finance the purchase. The TR1 bore an ‘X’ in Box 11 which appeared next to the words ‘the transferees are to hold the property on trust for themselves as tenants in common in equal shares’. The claimant sought a declaration that the property was held as described by Box 11 and an order for sale. The defendant maintained in a number of witness statements that the ticking of Box 1...

Beneficial ownership: Marring the deal

Context is everything when defining the common intention constructive trust. Aidan Casey QC and Tom Poole discuss recent case law Marr has changed the way courts should approach disputes about the beneficial ownership of family-owned investment property portfolios. It has been recognised since the decisions of the House of Lords in Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] …
This post is only available to members.

Beneficial ownership: Honesty is the best policy

Peter Shaw QC explores the principles of ascertainment of beneficial ownership in a property purchase tainted with illegality ‘Having found that Mr and Mrs Kliers were the true beneficial owners, it would perpetuate the fraud to leave the property in Mr Schmerler’s ownership (without making a declaration of beneficial ownership). The illegal activities were required …
This post is only available to members.

Beneficial ownership: Registration required

Overseas entities must register beneficial ownership in order to own or sell UK real estate, according to a new draft Bill published by the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, as Richard Clark finds out ‘Buyers, tenants and lenders will be reluctant to transact with any overseas entity other than a registered overseas entity …
This post is only available to members.

Beneficial Ownership: Behind the veil

James Brown and Mark Pawlowski consider the possibility of disclosing beneficial interests on the land register ‘The proposal to introduce a register of beneficial interests would need to coincide with a related amendment to the Land Registration Act 2002.’ Property lawyers will be familiar with the so-called ‘curtain principle’ under which beneficial interests are kept …
This post is only available to members.