Morris v Fuirer & ors [2022] WTLR 659

Summer 2022 #187

The claimant, who was the only child of Cynthia Morris (the testatrix), was the principal beneficiary under her will dated 25 October 2000 but not under later wills made on 28 November 2006 and 14 July 2010 (the wills). The testatrix died on 7 August 2017. Under the terms of her last will, the second and third defendants were appointed as executors; pecuniary legacies were bequeathed to the claimant (£35,000), the first defendant (£70,000) and the fourth defendant (£10,000); and her residuary estate was gifted to the sixth to ninth defendants who were charities. The claimant first intima...

Skillett v Skillett [2022] WTLR 679

Summer 2022 #187

Charles Skillett (Mr Skillett) and his wife had four children. Mr Skillett owned a smallholding and, on 7 December 2010, received a market appraisal valuing the smallholding at £50,000. On 19 May 2011, Mr Skillett and his wife made mirror wills which provided, in summary, on the death of the first spouse, for the surviving spouse to take everything absolutely, and on the death of the surviving spouse, for the smallholding to be given to their eldest son, the other three children to receive £50,000 and the residuary estate to be split equally among all four children. Mrs Skillett passed a...

St Clair v King & anr [2022] WTLR 703

Summer 2022 #187

The defendants were the executors of the deceased’s last will dated 20 May 2009 (the 2009 will). The claimant, who was the stepdaughter of the deceased, challenged the 2009 will. There were seven issues at trial:

(i) whether 2007 wills made by the deceased and her husband (the claimant’s father) were mutual wills such that if the 2009 will was admitted to probate, the estate needed to be administered to give effect to a constructive trust reflecting the terms of the 2007 will; (ii) whether there was a contract between the claimant and the deceased before the 2009 will to make and no...

Womble Bond Dickinson (Trust Corporation) Ltd v No Named Defendant [2022] WTLR 765

Summer 2022 #187

By a trust instrument dated 29 April 1986 (the 1986 deed), Stephenson Clarke Shipping Ltd, a subsidiary of Powell Duffryn plc and member of the Powell Duffryn group of companies (the PD Group), as the named settlor, settled cash and securities on a discretionary trust for the benefit of employees and former employees of the PD Group (the trust). The trust defined the beneficiaries as ‘the employees and their spouses and dependants and the former employees and their spouses from time to time during the trust period [being the period expiring eighty years from the date of the trust] of the...

Goodwin v Avison & ors WTLR(w) 2022-04

Web Only

Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Ltd WTLR(w) 2022-03

Web Only

Building Safety Act 2022: Planning update

Fiona Sawyer and Matthew White consider the implications for developers of the Act, and in particular of s128Section 128(4) provides that the prohibition from carrying out development will apply despite planning permission having been granted. In PLJ November 2021 (#392), we wrote about requirements in the Building Safety Bill which related to planning. Planning Gateway…

Private rented housing: Putting things into perspective

Felicia Persis considers the government’s policy paper published in mid-June, which has been described as ‘biggest shake up of the private rented sector in 30 years’The DLHC acknowledges that there is an imbalance in the landlord and tenant relationship, as the White Paper states that scrapping the s21 termination route will ‘level the playing field…

Construction focus: Demystifying grounds for extensions of time

Dan Easom looks at the factors to consider when considering extension of time claimsGiven that all or most of the above requirements will likely apply to extension of time claims regardless of the ground being relied upon, it is important for a contractor to bear these in mind. Construction contracts invariably require contractors to carry…

Climate change: An obviously material planning consideration?

In the first of two articles on climate change, Frank Orr provides an analysis of its legislative contextNotwithstanding the exigency implicit within the CCA, climate change as a potential material planning consideration enjoys no special status per se within T&CP decision-making, let alone any express provision in decision-making either in the TCPA 1990 or PA…