Page 23 of 109
SM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] WTLR 1025
JUDGMENT JUDGE T H CHURCH: Decision As the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (which it made at Peterborough on 18 February 2019 under reference SC304/18/02779) involved the making of an error of law, it is set aside and I remake the decision in the following terms: ‘The appeal is allowed. The decision of the decision …
Continue reading “SM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] WTLR 1025”
October 11, 2021
Re Shanavazi [2021] WTLR 1037
JUDGMENT MASTER CLARK: [1] In this Part 8 claim dated 24 November 2020, the claimant, Bibi Marium Shanavazi, seeks an order authorising her, on behalf of her minor son, Ilyas Firas Shanavazi (‘Ilyas’) to enter into a contract of sale of a property in Germany, and to convey the property to the purchaser. [2] The …
Continue reading “Re Shanavazi [2021] WTLR 1037”
Smith & anr v Michelmores Trust Corporation Ltd & ors [2021] WTLR 1051
JUDGMENT HHJ PAUL MATTHEWS: Introduction [1] On 14 May 2021, I heard and determined a claim under CPR Part 8 issued only one week before, on 7 May 2021, for an order that the Court give its approval to a proposed distribution by the claimants out of a discretionary trust created by the will of …
Continue reading “Smith & anr v Michelmores Trust Corporation Ltd & ors [2021] WTLR 1051”
Smith & anr v Michelmores Trust Corporation Ltd & ors (costs) [2021] WTLR 1083
JUDGMENT HHJ PAUL MATTHEWS: Introduction [1] On 27 May 2021 I handed down written reasons, under neutral citation [2021] EWHC 1425 (Ch), for my oral decision on 14 May in a Part 8 claim seeking directions form the court. This claim was in effect to approve a proposed appointment by the claimants, as trustees of …
Continue reading “Smith & anr v Michelmores Trust Corporation Ltd & ors (costs) [2021] WTLR 1083”
Thomas v Thomas & ors [2021] WTLR 1091
JUDGMENT HHJ KEYSER QC: Introduction [1] This is my judgment upon a Part 8 claim for construction of a will. Although it is naturally a matter of concern to the parties, it involves no significant issue of law. I gave my decision at the conclusion of the hearing and now give my reasons. [2] Mrs …
Continue reading “Thomas v Thomas & ors [2021] WTLR 1091”
Titcombe v Ison [2021] WTLR 1101
JUDGMENT MASTER RHYS: The Claim [1] This is a claim brought against the sole beneficiary of the estate of Patricia Ann Richards deceased who died in Monaco on 22nd February 2015. By her will dated 21st February 2014 (‘the 2014 Will’), the Deceased left her entire estate to the Defendant, a close friend of hers, …
Continue reading “Titcombe v Ison [2021] WTLR 1101”
Ugolor & ors v Ugolor [2021] WTLR 1127
JUDGMENT PETER KNOX QC: [1] I have before me an application by the Defendant, Mr Glenroy Eseh Ugulor, to allow him to remortgage the property known as 41 St Donatts Road, London SE14 6NU in Catford, London with a different lender from the one who currently has a mortgage over it. He wishes to do …
Continue reading “Ugolor & ors v Ugolor [2021] WTLR 1127”
Wrangle v Brunt & anr [2021] WTLR 1143
JUDGMENT MR JUSTICE MICHAEL GREEN: Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the order of Master Teverson dated 15 July 2020. In fact, by the order of Mann J dated 2 November 2020, the Appellants’ application for permission to appeal Master Teverson’s order and the appeal itself were directed to be heard together in a …
Continue reading “Wrangle v Brunt & anr [2021] WTLR 1143”
Sangha v Sangha & ors WTLR(w) 2021-12
JUDGMENT DEPUTY MASTER BOWLES: [1] Hartar Singh Sangha (Hartar) died on 3rd September 2016, in Chandigarh, in the Punjab region of India, aged 72. He had been the owner of very substantial assets in India and in the United Kingdom. These two Claims are concerned with the validity of Hartar’s wills and the devolution of …
Continue reading “Sangha v Sangha & ors WTLR(w) 2021-12”
Mundil-Williams v Mundil-Williams & ors WTLR(w) 2021-11
JUDGMENT JUDGE KEYSER QC: Introduction [1] This is a dispute as to the identity of the last valid will of John Williams (‘the testator’), who died on 27 September 2017 aged 91 years. He was survived by his four sons, who are the claimant and the first, second and third defendants; for convenience, I shall …
Continue reading “Mundil-Williams v Mundil-Williams & ors WTLR(w) 2021-11”
Page 23 of 109