Part 36: Exploring the changes

Osbornes | March 2015 #133
Stephanie Prior examines the latest changes to the Civil Procedure Rules ‘It is now that there is a complete change to Part 36 and these new changes will come into force and will apply to all offers made after 6 April 2015. These changes are extensive and require careful consideration.’The Civil Procedure Rules came into …

Continue reading "Part 36: Exploring the changes"

This post is only available to members.

Advocate’s Advice: Annual review

Exchange Chambers | March 2015 #133
Bill Braithwaite highlights the major trends in personal injury law that have drawn his interest in the last year, as well as the importance of practical case experience ‘Good management of catastrophic personal injury litigation requires a clear view of how the claim can and should be presented to best advantage.’It’s always interesting for me …

Continue reading "Advocate’s Advice: Annual review"

This post is only available to members.

Health And Safety At Work: Back to 1898

Deans Court Chambers (Chambers of Craig Sephton QC) | March 2015 #133
Tim Trotman outlines the effect of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 on personal injury litigation ‘No diminution of a pre-existing national standard is permissible by the introduction of a national law intended to implement European health and safety directives.’ Where a breach occurred before 1 October 2013, regulations introduced under the Health and …

Continue reading "Health And Safety At Work: Back to 1898"

This post is only available to members.

Costs: Proportionality – the road to hell

QM Legal Costs | March 2015 #133
Paul Jones reviews the attempts that have been made to give guidance on proportionality in costs judgments ‘The Court of Appeal set out a test that courts should apply to determine the proportionality of costs for any given case. They claimed this would solve the problems of interpretation the courts and practitioners were having.’ In …

Continue reading "Costs: Proportionality – the road to hell"

This post is only available to members.

Case Report: Professor Carl Heneghan (administrator of the estate of James Leo Heneghan) v Manchester Dry Docks Ltd & Ors EWHC 4190 (QB)

12 King’s Bench Walk (Chambers of Paul Russell QC) | March 2015 #133
Causation; multi-defendants; asbestos ‘The judge did not accept that a period of exposure that does not increase the risk by more than double can be said to have materially contributed to the cancer.’The High Court ruled on the principles of causation to be applied to a multi-defendant case of asbestos-induced lung cancer. Mr Justice Jay …

Continue reading "Case Report: Professor Carl Heneghan (administrator of the estate of James Leo Heneghan) v Manchester Dry Docks Ltd & Ors EWHC 4190 (QB)"

This post is only available to members.

Causation: Reducing damages due to pre-existing conditions – a tenable argument?

7 Bedford Row | March 2015 #133
Julian Matthews discusses two recent cases which illustrate the potentially far reaching consequences of the rules of causation of damage ‘These cases clearly illustrate that the focus of attention in the assessment of damages in cases where there is a medical or other disability subsisting prior to the date of negligence must be upon the …

Continue reading "Causation: Reducing damages due to pre-existing conditions – a tenable argument?"

This post is only available to members.