Case report: Ho v Adelekun [2019] EWCA Civ 1988

12 King’s Bench Walk (Chambers of Paul Russell QC) | February 2020 #182
Contracting out of fixed costs; Part 36 offers; RTA Protocol ‘This decision provides welcome clarity as to the limited circumstances in which fixed costs will be disapplied by implication.’ This case concerned the application of the fixed costs regime for ex-Protocol cases at sIIIA of CPR Part 45, following acceptance of an ostensible Part 36 …

Continue reading "Case report: Ho v Adelekun [2019] EWCA Civ 1988"

This post is only available to members.

Evidence: Covert recording in a PI claim

3PB Barristers | February 2020 #182
Grace Nicholls considers the implications of a recent case that concerned the recording of medical examinations by the claimant ‘While noting that the covert recordings of Mr M and Mr K were “reprehensible”, the judge observed that the evidence obtained through the recording of Dr T’s examination was highly relevant and probative, indeed as were …

Continue reading "Evidence: Covert recording in a PI claim"

This post is only available to members.

Service: Late delivery

Civitas Chambers | February 2020 #182
Applications for extensions of time for service of a claim form are risky and should be avoided. Ian Meikle reports on the latest Court of Appeal guidance ‘The reason given for the need for more time was simply “there have been delays in arranging for service of the documents”. No witness statement was served with …

Continue reading "Service: Late delivery"

This post is only available to members.

Motor insurance: Racing exclusions in motor policies

2 Temple Gardens | February 2020 #182
John McDonald explores the interesting area of insurance policy exclusions and who ultimately ends up footing the bill ‘Even if an insurer can establish that the racing exclusion in its policy wording is on its face effective to exclude cover in respect of the activity being carried on by its insured at the time of …

Continue reading "Motor insurance: Racing exclusions in motor policies"

This post is only available to members.

Psychiatric injuries: A forgotten primary victim remembered

7 Bedford Row | February 2020 #182
Ann Houghton and Richard Baker outline the complexities involved in pursuing a claim for an involuntary participant ‘Adding “involuntary participant” to the claimant practitioner’s armoury is not fostering a compensation culture: it is enabling victims to seek recourse under a long-standing doctrine which the highest courts have recognised for decades.’ As all practitioners know, facing …

Continue reading "Psychiatric injuries: A forgotten primary victim remembered"

This post is only available to members.

Costs: What’s interesting about Part 36 offers?

QM Legal Costs | February 2020 #182
Paul Jones highlights the importance of compliance with the precise wording of Part 36 for an offer to be valid ‘The offer in this case was expressly exclusive of interest and so did not comply with CPR 36.5(4), was not a valid Part 36 offer and, therefore, did not engage the enhanced costs provisions of …

Continue reading "Costs: What’s interesting about Part 36 offers?"

This post is only available to members.

Clinical negligence: Wrongful birth: a complex anomaly

7 Bedford Row | February 2020 #182
Julian Matthews looks at the rules limiting recovery of damages in such cases, and practical issues relating to the quantification and management where a claim can be made ‘A wrongful birth claim based upon a negligent failed sterilisation, or failures in relation to antenatal screening, where there is then a disabled child born, is likely …

Continue reading "Clinical negligence: Wrongful birth: a complex anomaly"

This post is only available to members.