This category can only be viewed by members.

Good Practice: Holding the purse strings

Jo Summers examines new guidance for banks on controlling money for someone else ‘The framework is not binding and it is not a formal code of conduct. It uses a mixture of legal summary and guidance to help banks determine best practice, although some issues are left unresolved.’ After many years’ negotiation, ‘a framework for …
This post is only available to members.

Book Review: Useful and informative

Fiona Smith finds much to praise in the 2013 edition of a distinguished classic Williams, Mortimer & Sunnucks ‘Executors, Administrators and Probate’ John Ross Martyn and Nicholas Caddick QC 20th ed, Sweet & Maxwell ISBN: 9780414024342 £275.00 Williams, Mortimer and Sunnocks’ ‘Executors, Administrators and Probate’ is a staple of most private client practitioners’ libraries and …
This post is only available to members.

Charities: Live to give?

Kerry Rogers assesses the current attitude towards legacies and discusses how legal professionals should handle charitable giving ‘Legal professionals should ensure, that when a client draws up a will that makes little or no provision for their children, or other potential claimants, the client is made aware of the risk of a claim against the …
This post is only available to members.

Musings From Manchester: Who regulates?

Geoffrey Shindler questions the rationale of regulating will writing but not estate administration ‘Professional competence, among the will writing profession and those who are not professionals but who practise will writing, is to be regulated; those who carry out estate administration are not to be regulated. Why are the latter “excused boots”, as they used …
This post is only available to members.

Statutory Residence Test: Objective, clear, certain?

Hannah Herbert weighs up the pros and cons of the new statutory residence test ‘The aim of the legislation was to reflect the law as established in existing statute, case law and HMRC guidance… Now that the SRT is in place, most commentators agree that it is an improvement on the old system.’ When considering …
This post is only available to members.

Probate: A blast from the past

Andrew Francis discusses Gudavadze v Kay, which sheds light on a rarely used jurisdiction of the court to pass over those who would normally be entitled to a grant of representation ‘Gudavadze v Kay makes it clear that s116 is a very useful tool in the probate practitioner’s work box where the absence of a …
This post is only available to members.

Budget 2013: Deal with liabilities before death

Dominic Ribet reports on whether the amendments to IHT legislation contained in the recent Budget will lead to any unintended consequences ‘The resulting economic impact of changes to the IHT legislative framework could be far greater than the HMRC has anticipated.’ The 2013 spring Budget saw George Osborne take aim at hitherto uncontroversial arrangements that …
This post is only available to members.

Equity: To the rescue

Lisa Springate and Dina El-Gazzar examine the importance of the landmark decision in Re The Shinorvic Trust ‘With modern family relationships and changed social attitudes, obligations to support financially now extend to a much wider category of people. For example, illegitimate children, stepchildren, and same-sex partners.’ The decision in the recent case of Re The …
This post is only available to members.

Duty Of Care: What is included in your retainer?

Duncan Bailey reviews a case that discusses to what extent a law firm is responsible for unforeseen personal tax consequences stemming from a corporate transaction when private client advice is not part of the remit ‘The introduction of a reasonably competent private client tax team would have led to them advising Mr Swain and his …
This post is only available to members.

Trust Protectors: Obligation to indemnify?

Manx case IFG International v French clarifies the extent to which trust protectors can be indemnified out of trust assets. Seth Caine explains ‘Counsel for the trustees had argued that any indemnity to which Mr French was entitled as a former protector was limited, and related only to any costs and liabilities incurred by Mr …
This post is only available to members.