This category can only be viewed by members.
Ian Tucker and Charles Crowne discuss a recent ruling on retention of title ‘Unfortunately, the law around retention of title clauses is rather unclear. If goods are on-sold before title passes to the initial buyer, then it may not be possible for the original seller to claim the price.’ Retention of title clauses are widely …
Continue reading "Contract: Hands off!"
This post is only available to members.
Adam Forster examines a case with many lessons for practitioners ‘Omissions from the pleadings can have serious consequences, and the court will (or, at least, should) confine its consideration to the pleaded cases.’ The Court of Appeal has recently handed down judgment in the case of Credit Suisse AG v Arabian Aircraft & Equipment Leasing …
Continue reading "Procedure: Skeletons in the cupboard"
This post is only available to members.
Maura McIntosh reviews on a recent decision dealing with costs sanctions and Part 36 ‘The present decision suggests that the court may be less likely to order the new sanction where a claimant’s Part 36 offer is made very late in the day.’In the first case we have seen addressing the new costs sanction introduced by the …
Continue reading "Part 36: Last chance saloon"
This post is only available to members.
Clare Arthurs and Phillip D’Costa find out about recent developments in privilege ‘Tchenguiz provides some useful guidance as to how litigation privilege will be applied by the courts.’ Legal professional privilege attracts its fair share of judicial and public attention. Broadly speaking, it protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client from disclosure, in order …
Continue reading "Privilege: Litigation privilege – the dominance matrix"
This post is only available to members.
Rod Cowper examines recent approaches to the interpretation of guarantees ‘The only practical guidance that can be offered is that those having the benefit of a guarantee of a contract which is to be amended substantively ought to ensure that the guarantor is made aware of and consents expressly to the variations.’ Although judicial piercing …
Continue reading "Guarantees: Satisfaction guaranteed?"
This post is only available to members.
Morten Frank and Gregers Gam outline the Danish approach to the recognition of foreign judgments ‘As a starting point, judgments only have legal effect in the jurisdiction in which they were rendered; public international law does not provide a legal foundation for recognition of judgments from other jurisdictions.’ Traditionally, Denmark has not recognised foreign judgments …
Continue reading "Enforcement: Coming out of the cold"
This post is only available to members.
Julia Staines and Adam Welsh look at the costs of budgetary non-compliance ‘The underlying message from Mitchell and Henry is that the rules relating to costs budgets should be followed.’ In November 2008, Sir Anthony Clarke (then Master of the Rolls), appointed Lord Justice Jackson to review the cost of civil litigation, and to make …
Continue reading "Reform: Costing ‘plebgate’"
This post is only available to members.
Daniel Butler and James Whittaker discuss recent case law on case management ‘If a successful party concludes the litigation within the limits of the approved budget, there will not be a requirement for a later detailed assessment given that costs had already been approved by the court.’ The Jackson reforms promised new robust procedures on …
Continue reading "Procedure: The price of everything"
This post is only available to members.
Dan Carnall offers an overview of recent case law on cost budgeting ‘The judicial guidance highlights the importance and benefits of accurate budgeting, confirming that it is vital to remain vigilant throughout the life of a case and continually monitor each element of the budget.’The Jackson reforms introduced new rules providing courts with the ability, …
Continue reading "Costs: Counting the judicial cost"
This post is only available to members.
Joanna Ludlam and Ben Ko consider recent guidance on limitation and judicial review claims ‘It is clear that the mischief the majority sought to guard against was instances of individuals seeking to avoid the real substance of regulatory decisions against them by making applications for judicial review to challenge such decisions on a procedural basis.’ …
Continue reading "Limitation: Challenging cases"
This post is only available to members.
