This category can only be viewed by members.
Sapna Garg discusses the recent interim report by the Civil Justice Council Working Group on ADR ‘Perhaps the most significant recent development in this debate is the digital awakening that has occurred in the judicial system and the recent realisation that technology can potentially dispense with a myriad of administrative hurdles prevalent in a non-digitised …
Continue reading "ADR: Tough love – an obligation to mediate?"
This post is only available to members.
Jeremy Andrews and Giles Hutt look at the latest proposals for disclosure reform ‘A party can seek to overwhelm its opponent with disclosure, making it more difficult for them to find the few documents that make a real difference to their case.’ Disclosure reform is not new. Lord Woolf attempted it in the 1990s, when …
Continue reading "Disclosure: Forcing change"
This post is only available to members.
Andrew Beck and Gwendoline Davies take an overview of remedies for commercial fraud, deceit and bribery ‘While there may be circumstances in which it is necessary to plead fraud, parties should be mindful of the possibility that other types of claim may deliver the results they are looking for.’ Civil cases of fraud, deceit and …
Continue reading "Fraud: The whole truth and anything but the truth"
This post is only available to members.
Tom Whittaker weighs up the judicial scrutiny of contractual discretion ‘Historically, the court has required only that the relevant decision be made without arbitrariness, capriciousness and irrationality. More recent cases, however, suggest that the court may also require that the decision be reasonable.’ Contracts often confer obligations to make decisions, exercise discretion or form opinions …
Continue reading "Contract: Making your mind up"
This post is only available to members.
Adele Ashton and Jeremy Clarke-Williams examine the ‘serious harm’ test in defamation claims ‘Since the Defamation Act came into force, practitioners and judges alike have been wrestling with the question of what amounts to ‘‘serious harm’’ to a claimant’s reputation.’ The reputation of a business can be a crucial factor in its success. With the …
Continue reading "Reputation Management: Lachaux must go on"
This post is only available to members.
Fiona Simpson examines the merits of the Shorter Trials Scheme ‘The Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) will not usually be suitable for cases involving allegations of fraud/dishonesty, requiring extensive disclosure and/or reliance on extensive witness/expert evidence, or involving multiple issues/parties.’ In September 2015 the Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) was introduced to run as a pilot from …
Continue reading "Reform: Size matters"
This post is only available to members.
Sarah McCann reports on a recent application for relief from sanctions ‘At least insofar as the breach relates to costs budgeting, the emphasis appears to be squarely on considering the just outcome in all the circumstances.’ Much has been written about the court’s discretion to grant relief from sanctions pursuant to CPR 3.9 over recent …
Continue reading "Practice: Don’t be late"
This post is only available to members.
Gwendoline Davies and Claire Acklam make sense of the rules and recent case law on proportionality of costs ‘Even if costs are reasonable this does not mean that they will necessarily be proportionate. The court must identify which of the factors listed in CPR 44.3(5) are relevant to the case and relate them to a …
Continue reading "Costs: Keep it in proportion"
This post is only available to members.
Tom Snelling and Lauma Skruzmane continue their examination of litigation after Brexit ‘It is inevitable that uncertainty will arise before the courts of England and Wales because it is not clear when exactly the applicable legal regime for choice of court clauses will change.’ In our previous article (‘Climb every mountain’, CLJ74), we examined how …
Continue reading "Brexit: Courting Europe"
This post is only available to members.
Susan Rosser and Jonny Cohen consider a recent case of accidental disclosure ‘When a document is disclosed which is, on its face, privileged, it falls to the inspecting party to determine whether the document has been disclosed in error or whether privilege has been deliberately waived.’ In the recent case of Atlantisrealm Ltd v Intelligent …
Continue reading "Privilege: Accidents will happen"
This post is only available to members.
