This category can only be viewed by members.

Commonhold: A change for the better?

Lauren Fraser and Laura Bushaway consider the ramifications of the Law Commission’s proposed reforms The Law Commission’s proposals envisage a significantly larger role for the First-Tier Tribunal, making it the primary forum for disputes regarding residential property. Residential property ownership could look very different in the future if the Law Commission’s package of reforms to …
This post is only available to members.

VAT: New guidance on compensation payments

Sarah Cardew warns of the impact on past and future real estate transactions of recent changes to VAT rules Particularly worrying is the fact that the retrospective nature of this change might not be limited to VAT and could represent a change of direction for the government, as they seek to recoup revenue after the …
This post is only available to members.

Construction Focus: The Building Safety Bill and beyond

Emily Holdstock considers fire safety in the construction industry post-Grenfell, focusing on the Bill and the reforms it proposes to introduce The Building Safety Bill aims to establish a chain of duty holders across the life cycle of higher-risk buildings. Few will be unaware of the events at Grenfell Tower in west London on 14 …
This post is only available to members.

The Henderson rule: Applications to amend

Is it possible to resist an application to amend on the grounds that the new case could and should have been advanced earlier? Martin Hutchings QC reviews the basic principles in the context of a recent case One could be forgiven for concluding that the danger that the rule in Henderson is designed to meet …
This post is only available to members.

Business interruption insurance: Covid-19: insurance to the rescue?

Mike Scott considers the implications of the judgment in the test case brought by the FCA For both landlords and tenants, the FCA test case decision helps determine whether their specific policy wording covers the losses that have been suffered as a result of Covid-19. The topic of insurance has once again stepped into the …
This post is only available to members.

Planning for the future: Evolution comes with centralisation

Nicola Gooch assesses the government’s recent white paper aimed at streamlining the planning system Sites that are allocated within growth areas would be given an ‘outline planning permission’ by the allocation itself, subject to restrictions on height, massing or density set out in the allocation itself. On 6 August 2020, the government launched its ‘Planning …
This post is only available to members.

Residential possession claims: Lifting the stay on proceedings: more questions than answers

The stay on possession proceedings, which came into effect at the start of lockdown, is due to end on 20 September. Annabel Heath considers the steps for both existing and new claims, together with the defences tenants are likely to raise There is likely to be a flurry of litigation putting even further strains on …
This post is only available to members.

Covid-19 and construction: Six months on

Emily Holdstock assesses the implications of the pandemic so far and gives her thoughts on what lies ahead Force majeure is not defined within the JCT, but is understood by most lawyers to mean circumstances which are unforeseeable and beyond either party’s control. While many construction lawyers began to advise their clients on the implications …
This post is only available to members.

The future of leasehold and commonhold: The Law Commission’s proposed reforms

On 21 July 2020 the Law Commission published three final reports on residential leasehold and commonhold. Here, Professor Nick Hopkins, Simon Marciniak and Emily Fitzpatrick provide an overview of their recommendations as well as the thinking behind them There are shortcomings in the current law governing commonhold. In particular, it is too inflexible to accommodate …
This post is only available to members.

Residential leases: Case study: Clarifying a landlord’s obligations

George Mallet considers the practical implications of the recent Supreme Court judgment in Duval In affirming the distinction between the absolute and permissive clauses, the Supreme Court implicitly re-affirmed the established principles on the construction of contractual terms as set out (inter alia) in Arnold. In Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent Ltd [2020], the Supreme …
This post is only available to members.