This category can only be viewed by members.
Dr Walter Busuttil provides an update in relation to post traumatic stress disorder, Diagnostic Statistical Manual 5th Edition (DSM-V) and personal injury litigation ‘At the time of exposure to the traumatic incident, information processing becomes impeded and the victim is only able to process enough information to survive.’ In the USA, the Diagnostic Statistical Manual …
Continue reading "Psychiatric Injury: Changing classification"
This post is only available to members.
looks at recent decisions concerning the line to be drawn between personal responsibility and the liability of others Julian Matthews ‘The courts, often ready to find that there has been some degree of contributory fault, are now far more reluctant to fix individuals with the full consequences of their own actions then in earlier generations.’ …
Continue reading "Volenti: Dangerous activities"
This post is only available to members.
Shilpa Shah examines the difficult relationship between allocation and costs recovery ‘It was contended that the court should assess costs at the level allowed by reference to the small claims track provisions.’ While one of the aims of allocation was to enable the principle of proportionality to be dovetailed into the costs rules appropriate for …
Continue reading "Assessment: Stay on track with costs"
This post is only available to members.
Lisa Sullivan and Martyn Mcleish offer practical tips on how to navigate claims where allegations of exaggeration may arise ‘The defence operates as a rule of public policy by which an otherwise perfectly proper claim will not be allowed to proceed or a particular head of loss cannot be recovered because it offends public conscience …
Continue reading "Evidence: Problem issues and problem clients"
This post is only available to members.
Paul Jones discusses the prospects of appeal following a summary assessment of costs ‘A judge should consider the component parts of the claim for costs but he was not obliged to go through a box-ticking exercise in which he had to make a ruling on each and every one of the elements of the costs …
Continue reading "Costs: Summary execution"
This post is only available to members.
Liability of parent company; duty of care; asbestosis ‘The court had “little doubt that the defendant exercised control over some of the activities of CBP from the time that it came into existence and through the period during which the Claimant was one of its employees”.’ To what extent can a parent company be responsible …
Continue reading "Case Report: Chandler v Cape plc [2011] EWHC 951 (QB)"
This post is only available to members.
Giles Eyre looks at keeping expert witnesses up to the mark ‘In Jones v Kaney, the Supreme Court, by a majority of 5:2, overturned 400 years of established law in removing the immunity of expert witnesses.’ For as long as any of us can remember, if in the course of personal injury or clinical negligence …
Continue reading "Expert Witnesses: Clamping down"
This post is only available to members.
Paul Jones considers the latest Predictable Costs case ‘Where a claimant has issued proceedings prematurely, possibly with a view to avoiding being limited to Small Claims Fixed Costs, they may assess their Standard Basis costs at a sum equivalent to the costs that would have been payable on the Small Claims Track. This way, the …
Continue reading "Road Traffic Accidents: When is a small claim not a small claim?"
This post is only available to members.
Jack Harding discusses the consequences of Wilkinson v City of York [2011] ‘Even under s41 of the Act, the courts have long recognised that the standard of maintenance involves a careful balancing of public and private interests, having particular regard to the limited resources of local authorities.’ On 18 January 2011 the Court of Appeal …
Continue reading "Cash Strapped Councils: Resources and s58 of the Highways Act 1980"
This post is only available to members.
Mark Lee provides guidance as to whether legal expenses insurers can still oblige a policyholder to use their panel solicitors before proceedings ‘Most UK LEIs have refused to agree to the appointment of non-panel firms from the outset, relying instead upon the Regulations and case law that supports a more restrictive interpretation of the rights …
Continue reading "Freedom Of Choice: Panel show"
This post is only available to members.
