This category can only be viewed by members.

Costs management: Yirenkyi – providing much-needed certainty

Sam Hayman discusses the implications of the recent case of Yirenkyi and its effect on the costs management regime ‘Matters were not assisted by rounds of first instance conflicting decisions, and while this judgment does not extinguish all issues and ambiguity within the process it gives a robust framework to judges to operate within.’ Sir …
This post is only available to members.

Negligence: Who watches the gatekeepers?

Liam Ryan examines the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Darnley and its potential wider impact ‘There is a tendency in some courts to elide breach of duty and scope of duty issues with the concept of a duty of care (as had the majority in the Court of Appeal).’ There is an interesting …
This post is only available to members.

Costs: Part 36 offers – all or nothing?

Paul Jones explores whether all the penalties of a beaten Part 36 offer must apply or whether they can be severable ‘The matter arose from a clinical negligence case that had concluded in the claimant’s favour, including an order that the defendant pay the claimant’s costs on the standard basis.’ Once again, Part 36 offers …
This post is only available to members.

Case report: XX v Whittington Hospital NHS Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 2832

Clinical negligence; surrogacy; public policy and illegality; PSLA ‘It was argued on behalf of Ms X that the ratio of Briody was simply that the prospects of successful surrogacy in that case were so “vanishingly small” that the expenditure was not “reasonable” and, therefore, not recoverable as special damages.’ The defendant trust admitted negligence in …
This post is only available to members.

Bills of costs: Show your working out

Elliot Kay reports on a recent case that confirms you have to send a bill of costs to your client, even in fixed costs cases ‘Rule 17.2 expressly required a bill to be delivered or written notification to be given “first”, ie before the defendant took payment for its fees, and that had not happened.’ …
This post is only available to members.

Vehicle liability: Autonomous vehicles and other liability issues affecting cyclists

Martin Porter QC considers all the hot issues involving cycling accidents ‘The technology is probably not there yet, but there are grounds for optimism that autonomous vehicles will in time become significantly safer than human-driven motor vehicles.’ On 18 March 2018 Elaine Herzberg was pushing her bicycle across a dual carriageway road in Arizona when …
This post is only available to members.

Part 36: An offer you can’t refuse

James Marwick and Marcus Coates-Walker provide an invaluable summary of the latest decisions in the ever-changing arena of Part 36 offers ‘Hislop, it is submitted, is yet another instance of the court having to construct a Part of the CPR which was simply not drafted with fixed costs in mind and where the poor drafting …
This post is only available to members.

Vicarious liability: The perils of Christmas parties

Is an employer vicariously liable for injuries inflicted during a fight between employees? David Sanderson examines a recent case ‘It is in many ways remarkable that the trial judge should have taken such care to make and record findings of fact that seem so clearly to point towards a finding of vicarious liability, only then …
This post is only available to members.

Breach of duty: Saying the wrong thing

Shahram Sharghy reports on a case that concerned whether a duty of care was owed by a non-medically-trained receptionist ‘As soon as the claimant had been “booked in”, he entered into a relationship with the defendant of patient and healthcare provider. The scope of the duty extends to taking reasonable care not to provide misleading …
This post is only available to members.

Compensation for chronic pain: Good for your wealth but bad for your health?

Pankaj Madan explores recent research into the effect of the litigation process on chronic pain conditions ‘The most consistent finding of the study was that litigants’ perception of increased pain and minimisation of treatment effect was strongly reinforced by involvement in the compensation system.’ In November’s edition of Personal Injury Law Journal (‘What does it …
This post is only available to members.