This category can only be viewed by members.

Equality: Coalition promises culture change

Covington & Burling LLP | February 2011 #117
Helena Laughrin and Robin Wolfenden review the key employment-related recommendations in the government’s Equality Strategy ‘The government views making pay transparent as the first step to reducing the gender pay gap. It intends to work with businesses and others to develop a voluntary scheme for gender pay reporting in the private sector.’ On 2 December …

Continue reading "Equality: Coalition promises culture change"

This post is only available to members.

Agency Workers: Temporary measures

Mark Levine and Jennifer Millins examine the new rights to which agency workers will be entitled from this October ‘Agency workers can bring a claim in the employment tribunal against the agency and/or the hirer if their right to equal treatment under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR) has been infringed.’ The Agency Workers Regulations …

Continue reading "Agency Workers: Temporary measures"

This post is only available to members.

Employment Tribunals: A shotgun marriage

RadcliffesLeBrasseur | February 2011 #117
The proposed merger of the courts and tribunals could make current dissatisfaction with the service even worse, argues Stephen Levinson ‘There really seems little substance to the idea that users are having difficulty accessing the system. If anything, a cynic might suggest that recent government rhetoric makes it more likely that the policy over the …

Continue reading "Employment Tribunals: A shotgun marriage"

This post is only available to members.

Team Moves: Tide turns in poaching case

Pinsent Masons | February 2011 #117
A firm of insurance brokers has failed in its claim against a group of employees who joined a rival firm, reports Gary Freer ‘In Lonmar Global Risks v West & ors, in alleging that the team members should have disclosed to it what each knew of the intentions of the others to leave and join …

Continue reading "Team Moves: Tide turns in poaching case"

This post is only available to members.

Age Discrimination: Time is money

Winckworth Sherwood | February 2011 #117
David von Hagen looks at a recent EAT decision on whether employers can justify dismissing a worker to avoid paying enhanced pension benefits ‘In Woodcock v Cumbria PCT, Underhill J said that the adoption of the costs plus rule tends to involve parties and tribunals in artificial game playing, including one of “find the other …

Continue reading "Age Discrimination: Time is money"

This post is only available to members.