Continue reading "TOLATA 1996: Competing priorities"
This post is only available to members.
TOLATA 1996: Competing priorities
Mark Pawlowski examines the court’s discretionary power to order a sale of the family home at the suit of a secured creditor ‘The cases decided since the coming into force of TOLATA 1996 have continued to afford the interest of the creditor priority over the occupying spouse/partner, even in circumstances where the effect of the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Bank of Ireland Home Mortgages Ltd v Bell [2001] 2 All ER (Comm) 920
- Barclays Bank plc v Hendricks & anor [1996] 1 FLR 258
- C Putnam & Sons v Taylor & anor [2009] EWHC 317 (Ch)
- Close Invoice Finance Ltd v Pile & anor [2008] EWHC 1580 (Ch)
- Edwards v Edwards & anor [2010] EWHC 652 (Ch)
- Edwards v Lloyds TSB Bank plc [2004] EWHC 1745 (Ch)
- First National Bank plc v Achampong & ors [2003] EWCA Civ 487
- Forrester Ketley & Co v Brent & Palette [2009] EWHC 3441 (Ch)
- Lloyds Bank plc v Byrne [1993] 1 FLR 369
- Mortgage Corporation v Shaire & ors [2000] WTLR 357
- National Westminster Bank plc v Rushmer & anor [2010] EWHC 554 (Ch)
- Norton Rose v Davidson & anor [2004] EWHC 3316 (Ch)
- Pritchard Englefield v Steinberg [2004] EWHC 1908 (Ch)
- Re Citro [1991] Ch 142
- Telecom Plus plc v Hatch [2005] EWHC 1523 (Ch)
- TSB Bank plc v Marshall [1998] 2 FLR 769