Brooke & ors v Purton & ors [2014] EWHC 547 (Ch)
June 2014 #140In 2009 Steven Huntley (the deceased) sought the advice of a solicitor in relation to wills and inheritance tax planning. At the date of his death, 11 March 2011, the deceased’s estate was valued at £6.9m, which was comprised of a 90% shareholding in an unquoted company (£5.4m), real estate, vintage cars and cash. The deceased’s estate was substantially similar in 2009.
The deceased had wanted to leave his estate equally between his partner, Louise, and his five children. He had expressed concerns to his solicitor about leaving substantial assets to his children outright and his s...
Fischer v Diffley & anr [2013] EWHC 4567 (Ch)
June 2014 #140The claimants were the representatives of Louise Beck (Louise)’s family in Germany. Louise died on 17 January 2011 and the claimants sought a declaration that Louise had died intestate and that the two wills which she had executed on 1 March 2009 (the first will) and 2 May 2010 (the second will) were invalid.
Louise held substantial assets in both England and Germany, mainly comprising real estate and cash. The wills purported to deal with all of her assets in both jurisdictions. If the wills were found to be invalid then the English estate would pass to her surviving niece...
Pullan v Wilson & ors [2014] EWHC 126 (Ch)
May 2014 #139The claimant (Mr Pullan) was a beneficiary of ten high-value family trusts. The first defendant (Mr Wilson) was an accountant who had been appointed as a professional trustee of those trusts. Mr Wilson was also a non-executive director of three of the companies in which the trusts held shares. The second and third defendants were the co-trustees of the ten trusts and were not subject to the relief sought by Mr Pullan.
Mr Pullan brought a claim against Mr Wilson as he considered that the professional charges of £849,890 for the period from 12 March 2007 to 4 November 2010 exceeded...
White v Matthys & ors [2014] EWHC 648 (Ch)
May 2014 #139Joseph Robson (the deceased) had two sons, the fourth and fifth defendants. When he retired in 1992, the deceased sold his residential property and moved to Spain. He did not own any property in the UK thereafter.
By a will dated 30 March 1995, the deceased left his Spanish estate to the fourth defendant absolutely. By a will dated 29 November 2006 (the 2006 will), the deceased appointed the claimant as his executor and left his residuary estate outside Spain to the British National Party (the BNP). The deceased died on 21 March 2010 leaving a net English estate of approximately £...
Brudenell-Bruce, Earl of Cardigan v Moore & ors [2013] EWHC 4408 (Ch D)
May 2014 #139The claimant, Mr Brudenell-Bruce Earl of Cardigan brought a claim for breach of trust against two trustees of the Savernake Estate trust of which he is a beneficiary.
Mr Moore is a lay trustee of the trust. Mr Cotton is a professional trustee and an accountant. No claim was brought against the third trustee Mr Ford.
On 14 November 2013 the claimant applied for permission to amend his particulars of claim. A draft of the proposed re-amendments was supplied to all parties on 1 October 2013. The second defendant replied to the draft stating that he was minded to agree to the...
Loring v Woodland Trust [2013] EWHC 4400 (Ch)
May 2014 #139The testatrix, T, died on 1 September 2011 leaving an estate with a net value of £680,805. Her will, dated 2 February 2001, included provision for a nil rate band legacy for her children and grandchildren under clause 5 which stated:
‘MY TRUSTEES shall set aside out of my residuary estate assets or cash of an aggregate value equal to such sum as is at the date of my death the amount of my unused nil rate band for inheritance tax and to hold the same for such of the following as shall survive me.’
The residue was left to the first defendant, the Woodland Trust ...
Markou & anr v Goodwin & ors [2013] EWHC 4570 (Ch)
May 2014 #139Mrs Eileen Rand died on 4 November 2007 aged 79 having executed two wills during her lifetime – one dated 20 June 2007 and the other 18 December 1969.
Mrs Rand had two siblings – Horace (known as Bill) and Derek. Bill married twice, the second time to Mrs Rand’s best friend since school Lillian (known as Pat).
In 1967 at the age of 38 Mrs Rand married for the first and only time to Edward Rand (known as Ted). Ted was already a widower and much older than Mrs Rand. Ted died after 18 months of marriage and left his entire estate including the martial home to Mrs Rand. Ted had...
National Westminster Bank plc v Lucas & ors [2014] EWHC 653 (Ch)
May 2014 #139The television presenter Jimmy Savile (the deceased) died on 29 October 2011. His estate had an approximate value of £3.3m after the deduction of various expenses incurred by the date of this hearing. By his will, the deceased appointed National Westminster Bank plc (the bank) to act as his personal representative. The deceased’s will makes gifts to a number of individual beneficiaries, one of which was the fifth defendant, the deceased’s niece, who was appointed to represent the interests of these individual beneficiaries (the individual beneficiaries). Thereafter the deceas...
Haider v Syed
April 2014 #138This was a challenge to the purported will of Mrs Naseem Syed Khan (the deceased) on the basis that it was a forgery. The deceased died on 17 July 2008. Mr Jafar Ali Khan (Mr Khan) was the deceased’s husband. Mr Khan had survived the deceased and had taken out letters of administration in respect of her estate on the basis that she had died intestate. Mr Khan died on 8 January 2011 leaving a will dated 2 September 2010.
Mr Syed Ali Haider (the claimant) was the deceased’s nephew. Mr Mehdi Hassan Syed (the defendant) was the sole executor and main beneficiary of the la...
Kevern v Ayres & anr [2014] EWHC 165 (Ch)
April 2014 #138Raymond Ayres deceased died intestate on 4 June 2008. The claimant is the deceased’s sister and the first defendant his wife.
As the deceased left no issue, his estate devolved according to the intestacy rules. Accordingly, his chattels and a statutory legacy of £200,000 went to the first defendant absolutely and the remainder of his estate was divided equally between the claimant and first defendant.
In these circumstances, the first defendant intimated a claim for reasonable financial provision from the deceased’s estate. Given the potential for post-death i...