Continue reading "Undue Influence: Practical justice"
Pearce v Beverley [2013] EWHC 2627 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | January/February 2014 #136John Pearce (Mr Pearce) died on 23 July 2008. His daughter, the claimant, challenged the validity of a will purportedly made by Mr Pearce on 20 June 2007 (the will) on grounds of lack of capacity and want of knowledge and approval, and also challenged a number of lifetime transactions said to be procured by the defendant’s undue influence.
Mr Pearce’s second marriage broke down in 2004 and he consequently became lonely and depressed. His health was generally deteriorating. He suffered from partial kidney failure, which was first noted in March 2005, and by 2006 from s...
Brown v Stephenson [2013] EWHC 2531 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2013 #135The claimant was the owner of a smallholding that comprised a barn known as Capri Lodge (Capri Lodge) and an adjoining three-acre paddock (paddock) and seven-acre piece of woodland (woodland) at Northgate Farm, Morpeth, Northumberland, where she carried on a goat husbandry business then called Dairy Goat Produce. In August 2001 she entered into partnership with the defendant, on terms that he would carry out development works to Capri Lodge to the value of half of its then valuation of £45,000, and that they would carry on as equal partners the business now known as Capri Lodge Products....
Tociapski v Tociapski [2013] EWHC 1770 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | December 2013 #135The claimant and defendant are the two sons of Mr Igor Tociapski (the deceased), who died on 12 March 2010 and had made a will dated 20 June 2007 and a later will dated 13 May 2009 (the 2009 will). The 2007 will shared the estate between the two sons. The 2009 will gave the entire estate to the defendant. By a transfer dated 12 February 2010 (the transfer), the deceased gave to the defendant a property known as Hillcrest Cottage, in Northamptonshire.
The claimant sought to set aside the 2009 will on the grounds that the deceased did not know and approve its contents alternatively...
Evans & ors v Lloyd & anr [2013] EWHC 1725 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | September 2013 #132Wynne Evans (Wynne) died on 2 September 2006 at the age of 79. He had worked on a farm from the age of 14. The farm latterly belonged to the defendants, David Lloyd (David) and his wife Elizabeth Lloyd (Elizabeth). Previously it had belonged to David’s parents and grandparents.
There was an issue as to whether Wynne had died testate or intestate. The claimants argued he died intestate but the defendants argued that he died testate and that the will, of which David was residuary beneficiary, had been lost.
The first claimant Howell Evans (Howell) is Wynne’s sole ...
Hart & anr v Burbidge & ors; Samways & ors v Burbidge & ors [2013] EWHC 1628 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | September 2013 #132The deceased, Phyllis Hart née Samways (W) died on 7 November 2008 aged 86. Her husband (H) had died in January 2005. They left three children, two sons, Kenneth (K) and Paul Hart (P) and a daughter Susan Burbidge (S), who all have children of their own. W had a twin sister (J) who died four weeks after her and three other surviving siblings: Arthur, Graham and Christine (the Samways). Some eight years before he died H wished to sell the family firm to one of his children, but only S and her husband (B) were prepared to take it over on his terms, which did not include the transfer of the...
Hubbard & anr v Scott & ors [2011] EWHC 2750 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | January/February 2012 #116The claimants were default beneficiaries who, in the event, stood to benefit under the terms of the will of Albert Wiseman (testator) dated 25 November 1997. They and their mother, who were longstanding friends of the testator, visited him at his home after the death of his wife. However, their visits tailed off during the last years of his life and, at some stage after May 2006, a neighbour introduced the testator, then aged 84, to the third defendant who initially worked for him as a cleaner. There was a dispute of fact as to whether this occurred over three years or under three months...
Curtis & ors v Pulbrook & ors [2009] EWHC 782 (Ch)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | November 2011 #114The claimants were the step-children of Arthur Ronald Towns (Mr Towns). Mr Towns had commenced the claim on 5 October 2007 and had died on 3 June 2008. The claimants were substituted for Mr Towns on 3 September 2008 as executors of his estate. Repayment was sought of sums totalling £127,000 said to have been withdrawn by the first defendant (Henry Pulbrook) from an account in the joint names of Mr Towns and his late wife Edith Anne Towns (Mrs Towns). The claimants were Mrs Towns’ children from her first marriage.
Each of the claimants and the defendants was a descendant of ...
Presumed Undue Influence: When advice is neither necessary nor sufficient
Continue reading "Presumed Undue Influence: When advice is neither necessary nor sufficient"