Schedule 1: Viewed in the round

Paris Smith LLP | Family Law Journal | February 2022 #210
Heather Souter reflects on the usefulness of the millionaire’s defence in Sch 1 proceedings in the context of the statutory criteria While Re Z confirms that the millionaire’s defence may be raised and relied upon in Sch 1 proceedings, it is important to note that such a defence does not give blanket protection when it …

Continue reading "Schedule 1: Viewed in the round"

This post is only available to members.

Schedule 1: All in the past?

Russell-Cooke LLP | Family Law Journal | May 2021 #203
Rebecca Stone analyses legal costs orders involving both historic and future costs The judgment in Re Z highlights the importance of solicitors applying for legal funding as early as possible, considering what credit, if any, they are prepared to extend to a client, and making it clear to clients from the outset they will cease …

Continue reading "Schedule 1: All in the past?"

This post is only available to members.