Continue reading "Client Care: Clients without capacity – managing their property and affairs"
Client Care: Clients without capacity – managing their property and affairs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/689e5/689e5ee56a397d66b0a64d1d3f0f158d855c2396" alt=""
The applicant, TH, the donee of an enduring power of attorney for the property and affairs of his father, HH, applied for retrospective approval of payments and gifts made between 2011 and 2017 in the sums of £88,366 in favour of the applicant and his family, and £15,196 in favour of his brother JH, the first respondent, and his family. JH opposed approval of all sums save for £30,000.
HH lacked capacity and was unable to participate in any meaningful way in decisions about his welfare or property or affairs. He required constant care from August 2010. TH provided sporadic ...
A, who was 18 years old, had received £5,000,000 in settlement of a claim for clinical negligence which had left her with cerebral palsy, epilepsy, cortical blindness, severe intellectual impairment and extreme behavioural problems. She lived at home with her parents and siblings. A professional with 25 years’ experience, David Ross of Simpson Millar, Solicitors, was appointed by the Court of Protection as deputy for her property and affairs. B, who was A’s brother, had not progressed at primary school as well as he could have during the build up to the trial in the High Cour...
This was an application by the deputy of an 11 year-old boy (AK) for a gift of £150,000 to be made by him to his parents from the damages awarded to AK under a settlement of a clinical negligence claim brought by his mother acting as his litigation friend against the local NHS Trust in 2009.
AK was born in October 2002 and suffers from cerebral palsy as a result of a prolonged period of hypoxia at the time of his birth. In 2009, the High Court approved a settlement in his favour of the clinical negligence claim. The settlement included a lump sum payment of £1,050,000 plus the fol...
Continue reading "Client Care: Clients without capacity – managing their property and affairs"
JC had four biological children: A, B, C and D. A was born in 1942 to a 15-year old mother. He was subsequently fostered, but throughout his life always understood JC to be his father and in the forty years preceding trial had worked and been in regular contact with him. JC denied parentage of A, but paternity was conclusively established by a court authorised DNA test. B and C were born in wedlock, in 1953 and 1955 respectively. However, they first had contact with their father in or around 2006/7. Their relationships remained strained, C in particular refusing to attend the hearing as ...