The tech revolution: Can the law keep up with the pace of change?

Forsters LLP | Property Law Journal | March 2020 #379
Miri Stickland and Connor Morrison examine two recent cases in which the interplay between technology and ss1 and 2 of the 1989 Act is considered directly by the courts ‘While Yuen may not constitute binding authority, it does provide useful judicial direction on an important point on which there was previously no authority at all.’ …

Continue reading "The tech revolution: Can the law keep up with the pace of change?"

This post is only available to members.

Signatures: Sign of the times

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP | Property Law Journal | February 2015 #328
What counts in law as an effective signature? Malcolm Dowden investigates in light of recent case law ‘The Court of Appeal decided that the old rules relating to typewritten “signatures” were inapplicable to the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s2.’Apart from temper tantrums and fine food, King John, Henry VIII and Gordon Ramsay …

Continue reading "Signatures: Sign of the times"

This post is only available to members.