Continue reading "In practice: Conflicting views"
Pre-nups and private client: Take note
Continue reading "Pre-nups and private client: Take note"
KA v MA [2018] WTLR 125
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | Spring 2018 #171When the parties met in July 2000, they had both been previously married. In the husband’s case, a difficult divorce caused him to set his face against remarriage. He had three sons who spent significant periods of time with their father in a substantial property near Reading (Property G) which had a value of £3.35m. He (together with his brother) had a successful business in international travel and tourism, owning 51% of the shares in the company valued at £30m. The wife, who had no children, had two rented properties with a combined equity of £245,615. By the time she moved into Prope...
Marital Agreements: A state of uncertainty
T E
Continue reading "Marital Agreements: A state of uncertainty"
Pre-Nuptial Agreements: Turning of the tide
Continue reading "Pre-Nuptial Agreements: Turning of the tide"
Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd & ors [2013] WTLR 1249
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | September 2013 #132Michael Prest (husband) and Yasmin Prest (wife) were married for 15 years and had four children before the wife petitioned for divorce in March 2008. During the marriage the matrimonial home was in England, though for most of the time the husband was found to be resident in Monaco and there was also a second home in Nevis. Petrodel Resources Ltd (PRL), which was incorporated in the Isle of Man, was the legal owner of the matrimonial home and five other residential properties in the United Kingdom. PRL was part of a group of companies, one of which was the legal owner of two more resident...
AC v DC & ors [2012] EWHC 2032 (Fam)
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | June 2013 #130Mostyn J granted an application by the applicant (W) to set aside transactions pursuant to s37(2) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that had been made by the first respondent (H) on about 2 December 2010 by which H disposed of his 86.4% shareholding in D Holdings Limited (DH). None of the respondents opposed the application. There was an issue whether or not the effect of the order operated retrospectively for all purposes, including fiscal purposes. Judgment was reserved and further written submissions were invited to determine whether the order setting aside the transact...
Marital Agreements: Creating certainty
Continue reading "Marital Agreements: Creating certainty"
Family And Trusts: For richer, for poorer
Continue reading "Family And Trusts: For richer, for poorer"
International Focus: Close comparison
Continue reading "International Focus: Close comparison"