Kevin Kennedy and Andrew Walls report on the test in Banks v Goodfellow ‘This judgment provides very significant support that the Banks v Goodfellow test is the sole test for the court to apply when judging testamentary capacity post mortem.‘ The High Court in James v James [2018] has ruled that the test in Banks …
Continue reading "Capacity: Importance of the golden rule"
This post is only available to members.
Brendan Cotter considers how likely a claim against a testamentary predator is to succeed ‘The classic sign of undue influence is the main beneficiary being active in the preparation of a will in which they take a substantial benefit.’As Hilaire Belloc wrote in Dedicatory Ode 1910: ‘The question’s very much too wide, and much too …
Continue reading "Wills: Crossing a line"
This post is only available to members.
Hannah Southon explores a judgment concerning a rarely used power of the court to direct the division of jointly-owned chattels ‘The case serves to underline the fact that if it is important to a donor who desires to dispose of assets by gifting them outright, rather than settling them on trust.’What relief is available from …
Continue reading "Chattels: Cutting the Gordian knot"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | October 2016 #163On 7 April 2016 judgment was delivered pronouncing for the force and validity of the will dated 1 February 2012 (2012 will) of Kenneth William Jordan (Mr Jordan) in solemn form of law and ordering that a caveat entered by the first defendant in respect of his estate cease to have effect. The normal rule of costs is that costs follow the event. However, the Court has discretion to make a different order, taking into account, for example, the conduct of the parties. In a contentious probate claim, there are also specific exceptions to the normal rule arising under case law and under the Ci...
Araba Taylor examines Re Butcher [2015], a case that puts the principles of Gill v Woodall into practice ‘The single test comes into its own where the court has enough facts, expert opinions and other evidence to enable it to make findings as to how the will was prepared and/or executed.’ Before the CA decision …
Continue reading "Wills: One step, two step…"
This post is only available to members.
Alexander Learmonth examines the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision on the costs of the claim for rectification of a will in Marley v Rawlings [2014] ‘When advising clients contemplating the risks of litigation, litigators should continue to adopt a cautious approach; clients must be ready to negotiate in good faith, rather than relying on …
Continue reading "Trust And Probate Claims: Counting the cost"
This post is only available to members.
Ailsa Moorhouse sets out a case that upholds a person’s right to leave their assets to whoever they choose ‘For the estimated one third to one half of the adult population in England and Wales who have made wills, the case of The Vegetarian Society is important, being, as it is, up-to-date evidence and reassurance …
Continue reading "Testamentary Capacity: Eccentricity allowed"
This post is only available to members.
