Wills & Trusts Law Reports | November 2013 #134The judgment concerned the costs of an application by the administratrix of the aforesaid estate (the Maitland Estate) pursuant to CPR, Part 64.2(a). Apart from two charities, there were six beneficiaries of the residuary estate under the will of the deceased. The first defendant, a beneficiary and formerly an executor, was the only of the defendants to oppose the application. The parties’ overall legal costs incurred up to and including the hearing were over £900,000, a staggering figure for an application of this kind, especially where the aspect of the estate in issue was worth ...
Lee Coulthard outlines some common pitfalls in the use of Part 36 A Part 36 offer does not protect a party against its own serious misconduct, and practitioners should be ready to alert the court to such misconduct at the close of any trial where a Part 36 offer is not beaten. When seeking to …
Continue reading "Part 36: Money: that’s what I want"
This post is only available to members.
Emily Campbell looks at recent cases that help to define the role of trustees in litigation ‘There are two main types of claim in litigation concerning a trust: ‘external’ disputes and ‘internal’ disputes. A typical example of an external dispute is a negligence claim by trustees against the trust accountants. A typical example of an …
Continue reading "Trustees: An emerging pragmatism"
This post is only available to members.
Michael Morton outlines recent case law considering the use and practice of CPR Part 36 ‘To eliminate chance and create certainty, litigators will look to the precise effects of CPR 36 to ensure successful recovery of costs.’ An assessment of recent case law from a small road traffic accident claim to a substantial multi-party building …
Continue reading "CPR Part 36: Pitch perfect"
This post is only available to members.
