Mark Pawlowski examines a recent case on the meaning of tenant’s fixtures in the context of a disputed claim to commercial plant and machinery ‘A tenant may only remove such objects as are classified in law as chattels or amount to tenant’s fixtures. Such removal, however, may sometimes be excluded by the express terms of …
Continue reading "Tenant: Plant and machinery considered"
This post is only available to members.
Brudenell-Bruce offers salutary lessons about the self-dealing rule, as Simon Atkinson explains ‘Brudenell-Bruce provides a restatement of the law relating to estoppel by deed and applies principles of construction to deeds and consent orders.’ For chancery practitioners Brudenell-Bruce (Earl of Cardigan) v Moore and Cotton [2012] provides valuable guidance in a number of areas. The …
Continue reading "Trustees: Self-dealing – rigours and risks"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | July/August 2012 #121At the end of the 1940s, the Savernake Estate, which was the subject of these proceedings, was held by a company owned by the 7th and 8th Marquesses of Ailesbury. Between 1949 and 1951 the company was replaced by a partnership. There was a conveyance executed in 1951 by which the estate was conveyed to the Marquesses on trust for sale as part of their partnership. The partnership property also included the family collection of paintings and other chattels. By 1963, there was an agreement that the partnership would be carried on by the 8th Marquess, who had a 51% share, and the trustees f...
