Case: G v E [2010] EWHC 2512 (COP); [2011] WTLR 199; [2010] EWHC 3385 (Fam); [2010] EWCA Civ 822

Re SH [2016] EWCOP 2

SH, who was aged 93, lived with her granddaughter, FJ, in Walthamstow. She had three sons, two of whom, RL and KLC, also lived in London. In April 2002, RL paid the entire purchase price for his mother’s flat and, by a trust deed, SH acknowledged that he was the beneficial owner subject to her right to live there for as long as she wished on payment of all outgoings. Six years later, on 23 April 2008, SH made two lasting powers of attorney (LPAs), one for property and affairs and one for personal welfare, whereby she appointed RL to be her sole attorney. Subsequently, on 17 July 20...

Public Guardian v CT & EY [2014] EWCOP 51

CT was born in 1929. He has a wife and two children: a son and a daughter (EY).

On 19 May 2013, CT suffered a stroke, which resulted in left hemiplegia and impaired vision. He was admitted to hospital where he was diagnosed as having vascular dementia.His stroke precipitated a rift within his family, with CT and his daughter aligned on one side and his wife and son on the other.

On 18 June 2013, CT executed a lasting power of attorney (LPA) for property and affairs appointing EY as his attorney and another person as a replacement attorney and named nobody to be given notice...

JS v KB & anr [2014] EWHC 482 (COP)

The application was made by JS for appointment by the Court of Protection under s19(1) of the MCA 2005 as DB’s deputy in relation to her property and financial affairs. JS was DB’s daughter. KB was DB’s son. MP was a local solicitor appointed to the court as deputy for DB on 13 February 2013. That application was resolved finally, save for the question of costs, by HHJ Hodge QC on 6 September 2013. By order made on that date (which was consensual), it is recorded inter alia that JS agreed not to pursue her application to be appointed as DB’s property and affair...

Re Po; Jo v Go & ors [2013] EWHC 3932 (COP)

PO was 88 years of age and lacked capacity to decide where she should live. She had four children, the applicant (JO), and the first, second and third respondents (GO, RO and MP). GO and RO were PO’s attorneys for property and affairs but no power of attorney or deputyship order was extant for welfare decisions.

Until the events giving rise to this application PO was habitually resident in England and Wales, living in her own property in Worcestershire with family and local authority assistance. However, in April 2012, GO moved PO to Scotland, initially to live with him but...

SM v HM 11875043/01

HM was born on 3 April 2004 and suffered from cerebral palsy following injuries she sustained during her birth. She was likely to lack capacity on reaching 18 and it was agreed that the Court of Protection had jurisdiction over her property and affairs. Proceedings against the relevant NHS trust for damages were compromised in 2010. The level of compromise damages was much less than the real level of HM’s likely care needs owing to leading counsel’s advice that her claim stood only a 25% to 33% prospect of success.

On 10 September 2010, District Judge Ashton had refus...