Wills & Trusts Law Reports | January/February 2017 #166The claimant was the administrator of the estate of Mr Mansouri who died in 2010. He sought declarations that the two defendant companies, ACP and ACM, were the agents and fiduciaries of the deceased and that they were therefore under a duty to provide him with records in relation to transactions or other business conducted on behalf of the deceased. The deceased had been a wealthy man during his lifetime and the claimant sought to understand what had happened to his wealth.
Held:
- 1) The relationship between principal and agent can only be established by the consent...
Giles Hutt and Alex Sciannaca examine Part 36 and discuss possible reform ‘Part 36 is excessively technical and counter-intuitive to lawyers used to thinking in terms of contractual offer and acceptance, and as a result many offers are defective.’ One section of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) that is generally thought to work well, but …
Continue reading "Part 36: An offer you can’t refuse"
This post is only available to members.
Matthew Evans examines recent case law on the technical requirements of Part 36 Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules offers parties valuable costs protection, and can put pressure on them to settle. The recent Court of Appeal case of F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd v Barthelemy [2012] is a reminder that parties need to …
Continue reading "Part 36: The devil’s in the detail"
This post is only available to members.
