Victimisation: Back to square one

Herbert Smith Freehills LLP | Employment Law Journal | July/August 2013 #142
In its second ruling on the point in two months, the EAT has decided that post-termination victimisation remains unlawful after all, reports Hannah White ‘The EAT took further courage in its conclusion from the fact that, according to the ECJ in Coote, the UK is obliged under European law to provide protection from victimisation, including …

Continue reading "Victimisation: Back to square one"

This post is only available to members.

Equality Act: No protection against post-employment victimisation

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP | Employment Law Journal | May 2013 #140
An EAT ruling has highlighted that the UK’s discrimination legislation is at odds with EU law, reports Olivia Toulson It is doubtful that Parliament ever intended to exclude post-employment victimisation and it is clear that EU law requires employees to have protection against such treatment. In Rowstock Ltd v Jessemey [2013], the Employment Appeal Tribunal …

Continue reading "Equality Act: No protection against post-employment victimisation"

This post is only available to members.