Carol Ravenscroft v Ikea Limited (2015) unreported, Manchester County Court, Recorder Mahmood, 17 and 18 December

Fundamental Dishonesty: A forecast for fraud – and a chance of meatballs

C H

In the second part of this article, Martin Littler suggests safeguards and amendments to CPR in order to ensure that such cases are streamlined and properly tracked ‘In cases involving fundamental dishonesty and fraud the real threat of an adverse costs order should be a Sword of Damocles for both parties.’ We saw in part …

Continue reading "Fundamental Dishonesty: A forecast for fraud – and a chance of meatballs"

This post is only available to members.

Fundamental Dishonesty: A forecast for fraud – and a chance of meatballs

C H

In part one of this two-part article Martin Littler discusses the arguments and findings in Carol Ravenscroft v Ikea Limited ‘Had the claimant lost the case, the claimant may have lost more than the damages; the claimant was concerned at the loss of her own employment; had a finding of fraud or fundamental dishonesty been …

Continue reading "Fundamental Dishonesty: A forecast for fraud – and a chance of meatballs"

This post is only available to members.