Zahra Kanani outlines Green v HMRC [2015] which upholds the principle that BPR does not apply to furnished holiday lets and clarifies ‘investment’ activities. ‘From the tribunal’s analysis, it was clear that the extra services provided were insufficient to demonstrate that the business is other than “mainly” one of holding the Flagstaff property as an …
Continue reading "Business Property Relief: Room for interpretation?"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | October 2015 # 153Mrs Green ran a business known as Flagstaff Holidays (the business) which let five units of self-contained holiday accommodation in a property known as Flagstaff House, Burnham Overy Staithe, King’s Lynn, Norfolk (the property). Mrs Green had bought the property for £900,000 in 2003. Between 2009-2012, the property was let for a total of around 650 to 750 nights a year. At all relevant times, Mrs Green lived in Woodbridge, Suffolk. On 2 February 2010, the property was valued by a firm of estate agents at £1.9m on a vacant possession basis.
On 5 April 2010, Mrs Green settled ...
James Hardaker and Tom Collins look at lessons to be learned from Best v HMRC [2014] ‘The message coming out of the Best decision is that it is becoming increasing difficulty for property letting or similar businesses to avoid being categorised as wholly or mainly investment companies for the purposes of IHT.’ Business Property Relief …
Continue reading "BPR: When Best not to invest"
This post is only available to members.
