Kayleigh Bloomfield looks at Wrotham Park damages ‘The Wrotham Park remedy attempts to quantify a sum which might reasonably have been negotiated between the parties as a quid pro quo for giving permission to the wrongdoer to act contrary to his or her contractual obligations.’ Restrictive covenants may be instinctively characterised as belonging to the …
Continue reading "Remedies: A walk in the park"
This post is only available to members.
A recent Court of Appeal decision may make it easier for employers to obtain Wrotham Park damages, explains Bob Fahy ‘Devenish can leave a claimant in difficulties where the problem is a lack of evidence to demonstrate loss. One potential solution is to seek Wrotham Park damages.’The remedies available where an ex-employee has unlawfully used …
Continue reading "Post-Termination Restrictions: Winning damages in One Step"
This post is only available to members.
Wills & Trusts Law Reports | November 2014 #144Mr Mikhaylyuk (M), a manager for the first respondent, NOUK, with responsibility for negotiating the charters of vessels owned by companies within the Novoship group, the remaining respondents, owed fiduciary duties to all the respondents. M had arranged a series of schemes by which he defrauded his principals and enriched himself and others by the payment of bribes given to him by those who chartered his principals’ vessels. These schemes included one concerning vessels chartered to companies owned and controlled by Mr Ruperti (R) which R then sub-chartered at substantially higher rates...
Gary Freer examines a recent case in which the court awarded gain-based damages for breach of employees’ restrictive covenants ‘The Wrothan Park decision was an exception to what was then the general rule that damages based on the wrongdoer’s gain are not available to remedy a breach of contract.’ In claims for damages for breach …
Continue reading "Restrictive Covenants: One step beyond?"
This post is only available to members.
How should damages be assessed where there is no loss to the claimant but the defendant has gained a benefit that he has not had to pay for? Robert Phillips looks at a recent case ‘We can draw from Eaton Mansions confirmation of the principle that even where a trespass causes no, or minimal, loss …
Continue reading "Trespass: Damages without loss"
This post is only available to members.
Lisa Springate and Dina El-Gazzar examine the importance of the landmark decision in Re The Shinorvic Trust ‘With modern family relationships and changed social attitudes, obligations to support financially now extend to a much wider category of people. For example, illegitimate children, stepchildren, and same-sex partners.’ The decision in the recent case of Re The …
Continue reading "Equity: To the rescue"
This post is only available to members.
David Sawtell looks at the calculation of Wrotham Park damages It is reasonable for the court to look at the eventual outcome and to consider whether or not that is a useful guide to what the parties would have thought at the time of their hypothetical bargain where there has been nothing like an actual …
Continue reading "Damages: Park life"
This post is only available to members.
Richard Bartle and Dr Keith Shaw analyse how developers are responding to the courts’ more robust treatment of those who deliberately breach their neighbours’ legal rights ‘Any developer who has kept an eye on recent developments in the law should probably think about reformulating its development strategy.’ Part one In a decision of the Land …
Continue reading "Restrictive Covenants: Not in my back yard – part two, bring in the bulldozers!"
This post is only available to members.
Richard Bartle and Keith Shaw discuss how developers are restrained by the restrictive covenants that burden their land, with reference to recent case law and possible future developments ‘The courts have historically attempted to take a firm line with those who breach a restrictive covenant in full knowledge of its existence, particularly after the party …
Continue reading "Restrictive Covenants: Not in my back yard!"
This post is only available to members.
