Continue reading "Drafting points: Endeavouring to understand"
This post is only available to members.
Drafting points: Endeavouring to understand
Heather McDonald and Natasha Rees outline the three types of endeavour and their current definitions and consider the practical implications of using each in drafting ‘Care should be exercised in the use of firms‘ precedent agreements and clarity should trump finality in order to ensure parties are clear on their obligations and that these are …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Ampurius Nu Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch)
- Astor Management AG & anor v Atalaya Mining plc & ors [2017] EWHC 425 (Comm)
- Bristol Rovers (1883) Ltd v Sainsbury‘s Supermarkets Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 160
- Dany Lions Ltd v Bristol Cars Ltd [2014] EWHC 817 (QB)
- IBM United Kingdom Ltd v Rockware Glass Ltd [1980] FSR 335
- Jet2.com Ltd v Blackpool Airport Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 417
- Little v Courage Ltd (1995) 70 P&CR 469
- Malik Co v Central European Trading Agency Ltd [1974] 2 Lloyd‘s Rep 279
- Minerva (Wandsworth) Ltd v Greenland Ram (London) Ltd [2017] EWHC 1457 (Ch)
- Phillips Petroleum Co (UK) Ltd v Enron Europe Ltd [1997] CLC 329
- Rackham v Peek Food [1990] BCLC 895
- Rhodia International Holdings Ltd v Huntsman International LLC [2007] EWHC 292
- Sheffield District Railway Co v Great Central Railway Co (1911) 27 TLR 451
- Terrell v Mabie Todd and Co Ltd [1952] 69 RPC 234
- UBH v Standard Life (1986) The Times, 13 November