Continue reading "Litigation Conduct: Drawing inferences"
This post is only available to members.
Litigation Conduct: Drawing inferences
Frances Bailey considers the courts’ approach where a party’s conduct during proceedings is in issue ‘An analysis of any add-back argument must also include an analysis of what both parties have spent and that the argument must be analysed in context.’ As ever, the law reports are seemingly full of cases where one party’s approach …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AC v DC (Financial Remedy: Effect of s37 Avoidance Order) (No 1) [2012] EWHC 2032 (Fam); [2013] WTLR 745
- AC v DC (No 2) [2012] EWHC 2420 (Fam)
- BJ v MJ (Financial Remedy: Overseas Trusts) [2011] EWHC 2708 (Fam); [2012] WTLR 395
- BP v KP & ors (Financial Remedy Proceedings: Res Judicata) [2012] EWHC 2995 (Fam)
- Evans v Evans [2013] EWHC 506 (Fam)
- F v F [2012] EWHC 438 (Fam)
- GS v L [2011] EWHC 1759 (Fam); [2011] EWHC 2116 (Fam)
- Le Foe v Le Foe and Woolwich plc; Woolwich plc v Le Foe and Le Foe [2001] 2 FLR 970
- M v M (financial misconduct; subpoena against third party) [2006] 2 FLR 1253
- M v M [2013] EWHC 2534 (Fam)
- Martin v Martin [1976] Fam 335
- McCartney v Mills McCartney [2008] EWHC 401 (Fam)
- NG v SG (Appeal: Non-Disclosure) [2011] EWHC 3270 (Fam)
- Norris v Norris [2002] EWHC 2996 (Fam)
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd & ors [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] WTLR 1249 SC
- Re C [2007] EWHC 1911 (Fam)
- Vaughan v Vaughan [2007] EWCA Civ 1085