Continue reading "Financial provision: Dealing with reality"
This post is only available to members.
Financial provision: Dealing with reality
Helen Cort considers the circumstances in which an order may be set aside on the basis of non-disclosure and the crucial issue of the burden of proof On an application to set aside an order on the basis of fraud, the court has to stand in the shoes of the court which made the order …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Ampthill Peerage Case [1977] AC 547
- Barder v Barder (Caluori Intervening) [1988] AC 20
- Cathcart v Owens [2021] EWFC 86
- Dixon v Marchant [2008] EWCA Civ 11
- Lazarus Estates Ltd v Beasley [1956] EWCA Civ 6
- Livesey (formerly Jenkins v Jenkins) [1985] AC 424
- Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60
- Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & ors [2019] UKSC 13
- The Royal Bank of Scotland v Highland Financial Partners LP & ors [2013] EWCA Civ 328