Continue reading "Schedule 1: All in the past?"
This post is only available to members.
Schedule 1: All in the past?
Rebecca Stone analyses legal costs orders involving both historic and future costs The judgment in Re Z highlights the importance of solicitors applying for legal funding as early as possible, considering what credit, if any, they are prepared to extend to a client, and making it clear to clients from the outset they will cease …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- A v A [2001] 1 FLR 377
- BC v DE [2016] EWHC 1806 (Fam)
- Chai v Peng [2014] EWHC 1519 (Fam)
- Currey v Currey (No. 2) [2006] EWCA Civ 1338
- G v G (Maintenance Pending Suit: Costs) [2002] EWHC 306 (Fam)
- LKH v TQA AL Z (Interim maintenance and costs funding) [2018] EWHC 1214 (Fam)
- R v R [2021] EWHC 195 (Fam)
- Re Z (Schedule 1: Legal Costs Funding Order; Interim Financial Provision) [2020] EWFC 80
- Rubin v Rubin [2014] EWHC 611 (Fam)