Continue reading "Schedule 1: Outside the lines?"
This post is only available to members.
Schedule 1: Outside the lines?
Jemma Pollock examines the decision in DN v UD and asks whether the boundaries for when provision may be made for a child age 18 or over have been pushed too far The court concluded that if an application under Sch 1 is made before the child is 18, the court acquires jurisdiction and retains …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- DN v UD [2020] EWHC 627 (Fam)
- J v C (Child: Financial Provision) [1999] 1 FLR 152
- MT v OT (financial provision: costs) [2007] EWHC 838 (Fam)
- Nokes v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd [1940] 3 All ER 549
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd & ors [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] WTLR 1249 SC
- Re N (A child) [2009] EWHC 11 (Fam)