Continue reading "Planning update: The boundaries of materiality"
This post is only available to members.
Planning update: The boundaries of materiality
Ralph Kellas summarises a recent Supreme Court case concerning an onshore community wind turbine and considers the state of the law in light of it ‘It does not follow from the court’s judgment that a community fund can never be a material consideration. Clearly, it will depend on particular circumstances.’ In November 2019, the Supreme …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Co Ltd [2017] UKSC 66
- Bolton MBC v Secretary of State for the Environment (1991) 61 P&CR 343
- CREEDNZ Inc v Governor General [1981] 1 NZLR 172
- East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB 484
- In Re Findlay [1985] AC 318
- Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578
- R (Copeland) v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2010] EWHC 1845 (Admin)
- R (on the application of Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd & anor [2019] UKSC 53
- R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Royco Homes Ltd [1974] QB 720
- R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [1994] 1 WLR 74
- Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates plc [1985] AC 661