Continue reading "Interim payments: You can’t always get what you want"
Interim payments: You can’t always get what you want
Jasmine Murphy analyses how to defend applications for interim payments ‘CPR 25.7(5) directs that the court must take into account contributory negligence when determining whether the amount sought is not more than a reasonable proportion of the likely final judgment amount.’ Interim payment applications are often the battleground for pre-trial skirmishes, the warm-up before the …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Cobham Hire Services Ltd v Eeles [2009] EWCA Civ 204
- Farrington v Menzies-Haines [2019] EWHC 1297 (QB)
- Folkes & ors v Generali Assurances [2019] EWHC 801 (QB)
- Grainger v Cooper [2015] EWHC 1132 (QB)
- HM Revenue and Customs v The GKN Group [2012] EWCA Civ 57
- Sellar-Elliott v Howling [2016] EWHC 443 (QB)
- Smith v Bailey [2014] EWHC 2569 (QB)
- TTT v Kingston Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 3917 (QB)