Continue reading "Privilege: Making Briggs without Clay"
This post is only available to members.
Privilege: Making Briggs without Clay
Stewart Hey, Simon Heatley and Iona Macmillan Douglas brush the dust off without prejudice privilege ‘There was no dispute that the relevant correspondence was without prejudice (WP). The question for the court was whether any exception to the rule applied.’ Legal professional privilege has been in the spotlight (and very rarely out of it) in …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Briggs & ors v Clay & ors [2019] EWHC 102 (Ch)
- Muller v Linsley & Mortimer [1996] 1 PNLR 74
- Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd & ors [2010] UKSC 44
- Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council & ors [1988] UKHL 7
- Somatra Ltd v Sinclair Roche & Temperley [2000] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 673
- Unilever plc v The Procter & Gamble Co [1999] EWCA Civ 3027