Continue reading "Privacy and nuisance: A ground-breaking storm in a teacup?"
This post is only available to members.
Privacy and nuisance: A ground-breaking storm in a teacup?
Does being overlooked amount to a private nuisance? Megan Davies considers a recent case involving the Tate Modern ‘Residents at the Neo Bankside development claimed that the public’s use of the Tate’s platform invaded their privacy and that they have a right to this being protected either pursuant to Art 8 of the European Convention …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Fearn & ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2019] EWHC 246 (Ch)
- Parochial Church Council of the Parish of Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley v Wallbank & anor [2003] UKHL 37
- Tapling v Jones (1981) 20 CB (NS) 174
- Turner v Spooner (1861) 30 LJ Ch 801
- Victoria Park Racing & Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor [1937] 58 CLR 497
- YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] UKHL 27