Continue reading "Planning update: A legitimate expectation to what, exactly?"
This post is only available to members.
Planning update: A legitimate expectation to what, exactly?
The Court of Appeal has considered whether the Secretary of State is required to give reasons for deciding not to ‘call in’ a planning application. Ralph Kellas considers the court’s findings and its implications ‘Lewison LJ deemed it an important question whether the SoS is required to give reasons for his decision whether or not …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AG of Hong Kong v Ng Yuen Shiu [1983] UKPC 7
- City of Westminster & anor v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 708 (Admin)
- Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79
- Lever (Finance) Ltd v City of Westminster [1970] EWCA Civ 3
- Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12
- R (on the application of Save Britain’s Heritage) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWHC 3059 (Admin); [2018] EWCA Civ 2137
- R v East Sussex County Council ex parte Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd [2002] UKHL 8
- Salih & anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWHC 2273 (Admin)
- Saunders v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 3756 (Admin)
- South Bucks District Council v Porter [2001] EWCA Civ 1549; [2004] UKHL 33
- United Policyholders Group & ors v AG of Trinidad and Tobago [2016] UKPC 17
- Wells v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1967] 1 WLR 1000