Continue reading "Agent of change: No panacea"
This post is only available to members.
Agent of change: No panacea
Amy Truman, Michael Greig and Pieter Claussen discuss the implications of a wider reliance on the agent of change principle to deal with noise nuisance ‘This is basically a proposal that the onus for ensuring that the occupants of a new noise-sensitive development will not be adversely affected by noise from an existing noisy use …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Chalmers & anor v Diageo Scotland Ltd [2017] CSOH 36
- Coventry & ors v Lawrence & anor [2014] UKSC 13