Continue reading "Nuisance: Neighbourhood watch"
This post is only available to members.
Nuisance: Neighbourhood watch
David Schmitz considers how the principles in Coventry v Lawrence on nuisance and the character of the area might best be applied ‘The confusion in this case is also the result of Lord Neuberger’s unelaborated suggestion that an iterative process be used.’ Among the many questions tackled by the Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Attorney-General v Cole & Son [1901] 1 Ch 205
- Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1993] UKHL 12
- Coventry v Lawrence [2011] EWHC 360 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 26; [2014] UKSC 13
- Gillingham Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co Ltd [1993] QB 343
- Halsey v Esso Petroleum [1961] 1 WLR 683
- Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] UKHL 14
- Kennaway v Thompson & ors [1980] EWCA Civ 1
- Lambton v Mellish [1894] 3 Ch 163
- Rushmer v Polsue & Alfieri Ltd [1906] 1 ChD 234
- St Helen's Smelting Company v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81
- Sturges v Bridgman (1879) 11 ChD 852
- Watson & ors v Croft Promo-Sport Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 15
- Wheeler v JJ Saunders Ltd [1994] EWCA Civ 8