Continue reading "Substantial Assets: A one-sided argument"
This post is only available to members.
Substantial Assets: A one-sided argument
Beth Mason and Georgia Day examine a case involving a large amount of assets, but also issues relevant to cases concerned with lesser sums ‘If a solicitor becomes a client’s ”man of business”, advising the client on investment matters, finance policy and other business matters, then the advice may lack the relevant legal context for …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- AAZ v BBZ & ors [2016] EWHC 3234 (Fam)
- AAZ v BBZ & ors [2016] EWHC 3349 (Fam)
- AAZ v BBZ & ors [2016] EWHC 3361 (Fam)
- Balabel v Air India [1988] 1 Ch 317
- Barclays Bank plc & ors v Eustice & ors [1995] EWCA Civ 29
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No 6) [2003] EWCA Civ 474; [2004] UKHL 48
- USA v Philip Morris Inc [2003] EWHC 3028 (Comm); [2004] EWCA Civ 330
- Ventouris v Mountain [1991] 1 WLR 607
- Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270