Continue reading "Costs: To fix or not to fix?"
This post is only available to members.
Costs: To fix or not to fix?
Paul Jones considers the potential conflict between fixed costs and Part 36 offers ‘Could the court, following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer in a fixed-costs case, make an order for the costs incurred in the late period to be paid in addition to the fixed costs?’ The system of fixed costs, which covers …
Cases Referenced
Cases in bold have further reading - click to view related articles.
- Broadhurst v Tan; Taylor v Smith [2016] EWCA Civ 94
- Excelsior Industrial & Commercial Holdings v Salisbury Hammer Aspden and Johnson [2002] EWCA Civ 879
- Fitzpatrick Contractors Ltd v Tyco Fire and Integrated Solutions (UK) Ltd [2009] EWHC 274 (TCC)
- McKeown & anor v Venton (2017) unreported Liverpool CC HHJ Wood QC 12 June
- Petrotrade Inc v Texaco Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 512
- Richardson v Wakefield Council (2017) unreported Leeds CC HHJ Gosnell 9 June
- Sutherland v Khan (2016) unreported Hull CC DJ Besford 21 April